Enablers of transdisciplinary collaboration for researchers working on climate risks in African cities

Abstract

This study explores enablers that help researchers to undertake collaborative transdisciplinary work with non-academic actors to co-produce knowledge on complex climate risks in African cities. Enablers were explored using a qualitative case study approach and expansive learning theory, which emphasises the embeddedness of practices in cultural and historical contexts. Concepts associated with expansive learning helped to consider relational enablers, namely: (i) capabilities required by researchers to understand the perspectives, values and motives of non-academic actors and make their own explicit; (ii) characteristics of spaces that allowed diverse participants to engage with perspectives, values and motives of others; and (iii) knowledge of the motivation behind different practices of non-academic actors, as embedded in different contexts. Findings highlight the importance of researchers’ intentional efforts to engage non-academic actors in their city contexts and respond to local priorities. Design elements that enabled relational work included explicit co-production framings, sharing experiences and opportunities for understanding various actor groups through structured activities and informal dialogues. The study highlights the situated and dialectical relationship between growing relational capabilities of researchers and their engagement in transdisciplinarity, provided spaces were created for reflection on activities. Relational enablers helped researchers to understand the heterogeneous experiences of actors working in African cities and tensions that influence their practices including traditional knowledge paradigms and siloed ways of working. The “champions” identified by researchers were those non-academic actors who took agency to engage with these tensions and begin transforming their practices towards multi-actor transdisciplinary knowledge co-production.

Importance of methodological pluralism in deriving counterfactuals for evidence‐based conservation

“…This isolation is perceived by many as a risk to the ability of protected areas to persist into the future, particularly when competing with other land-use demands (Cumming, 2016;Palomo et al, 2014). We encourage bringing in a diverse group of key actors directly into the conservation impact evaluation process from the start in the form of collaboration while balancing knowledge power dynamics in the process (principle 1) (McClure, 2023). This goes deeper than just identifying the need for protected area effectiveness studies to track both social and ecological outcomes and their interactions (Ghoddousi et al, 2022).…”