2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emulsions of glycerol in olefin: A critical evaluation for application in oil well drilling fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, using the chemicals in fabricating EBDFs, they are more expensive compared to petrodiesel and mineral oil. Furthermore, the use of EBDFs has also been limited as a result of a number of issues, including challenging viscosity control and instability in downhole conditions. As a result, oil companies are particularly interested in water-based mud (WBM) that has an excellent performance. Shale stabilizers or common inhibitors were used in traditional WBMs; however, they could not plug the shale nanopores, resulting in water intrusion into the wellbore, causing mud filtrate and clay swelling in huge quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, using the chemicals in fabricating EBDFs, they are more expensive compared to petrodiesel and mineral oil. Furthermore, the use of EBDFs has also been limited as a result of a number of issues, including challenging viscosity control and instability in downhole conditions. As a result, oil companies are particularly interested in water-based mud (WBM) that has an excellent performance. Shale stabilizers or common inhibitors were used in traditional WBMs; however, they could not plug the shale nanopores, resulting in water intrusion into the wellbore, causing mud filtrate and clay swelling in huge quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the continuous phases of OBDF consist of diesel oil or mineral oil, which are not environmentally friendly [5,6]. SBDF has similar performance to OBDF, and causes less pollution to the environment, but is difficult to promote due to its higher price [7,8]. WBDF has the least environmental impact and its price is low, making it easy to popularize [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the different components, drilling fluids can be divided into three types: water‐based drilling fluid (WBDF), oil‐based drilling fluid (OBDF) and synthetic‐based drilling fluid (SBDF) 9 . OBDF and SBDF are widely used because of their excellent high‐temperature stability and inhibition, which can effectively reduce the invasion of fluid and prevent the hydration of clay minerals 10,11 . However, it is difficult to be popularized because of its high cost, difficult post‐treatment, serious pollution and unfriendly to the environmental 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 OBDF and SBDF are widely used because of their excellent high-temperature stability and inhibition, which can effectively reduce the invasion of fluid and prevent the hydration of clay minerals. 10,11 However, it is difficult to be popularized because of its high cost, difficult post-treatment, serious pollution and unfriendly to the environmental. 12 Compared with OBDF and SBDF, WBDF has more outstanding advantages in cost control and environmental protection, and becomes a more reasonable choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%