“…Cells entrapment techniques include physical encapsulation in polymeric beads, such as microgels ( Zhou et al, 2018 ; Veernala et al, 2021 ) or alginate beads ( Shao et al, 2020 ; Hasturk et al, 2022 ), penetration and attachment of cells into porous 3D scaffolds ( Wu et al, 2020 ; Czosseck et al, 2022 ) or fiber‐based matrices ( Matera et al, 2019 ; Davidson et al, 2021 ; Sahu et al, 2021 ), bioreactors based on porous membranes ( Skrzypek et al, 2017 ; Bose et al, 2020 ), films made of super‐adhesive materials ( Suneetha et al, 2019 ; Nagano et al, 2021 ) and antibody‐conjugated magnetic beads ( Xu H et al, 2011 ; Nath et al, 2015 ). These devices can be obtained using innovative technologies such as 3D printing ( Agarwal et al, 2020 ; Dey and Ozbolat, 2020 ), photolithography ( Tricinci et al, 2015 ; Larramendy et al, 2019 ; Tenje et al, 2020 ), electrospinning ( Canbolat et al, 2011 ; Zussman, 2011 ; Ang et al, 2014 ), emulsion methods to obtain polymeric droplets ( López et al, 1997 ; Chaemsawang et al, 2018 ; Qu et al, 2021 ), surface coating technologies ( Yoo et al, 2011 ), sol‐gel encapsulation ( Kamanina et al, 2022 ), template‐assisted techniques ( Khademhosseini et al, 2006 ), etc. The cells are kept inside the device through physical immobilization ( Zhou et al, 2018 ; Shao et al, 2020 ; Veernala et al, 2021 ; Hasturk et al, 2022 ), extracellular‐matrix‐like adherence ( Rao and Winter 2009 ), specific antigen‐antibody recognition ( Roupioz et al, 2011 ; Boulanger et al, 2022 ), barrier containing ( Spagnolo et al, 2015 ; Larramendy et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2021b ) and external stimuli‐activated entrapment ( Fu et al, 2008 ; Long et al, 2020 ), etc.…”