2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emulate randomized clinical trials using heterogeneous treatment effect estimation for personalized treatments: Methodology review and benchmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies need to further ascertain the heterogeneity of treatment effects using methods such as double machine learning, single learner, and X-learner, and identify thresholds of NSAID days that may reduce the risk of depression. 73 Future prospective research studies are needed to confirm these findings and identify a subgroup of older adults with OA and cancer who may benefit from treatment with NSAIDs. 29 A number of other variables (eg, age, education, care fragmentation, poverty, and polypharmacy) predicted incident depression, consistent with bivariate findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Future studies need to further ascertain the heterogeneity of treatment effects using methods such as double machine learning, single learner, and X-learner, and identify thresholds of NSAID days that may reduce the risk of depression. 73 Future prospective research studies are needed to confirm these findings and identify a subgroup of older adults with OA and cancer who may benefit from treatment with NSAIDs. 29 A number of other variables (eg, age, education, care fragmentation, poverty, and polypharmacy) predicted incident depression, consistent with bivariate findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Estimation of HTEs plays an essential role in randomized clinical trials, in particular, to identify patients who benefit most by the intervention for developing personalized treatment (Imai and Ratkovic, 2013;Ling et al, 2023). Meanwhile, traditional statistical approaches like descriptive statistics and regression analysis have a strong tendency to focus on the significance of the estimated overall ATE rather than systematically evaluate the variation in treatment effects across subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This billing-purpose claim data is inherently noisy and sparse, thus requires careful data preparation (e.g., setting observation windows to exclude subjects who are not old enough to have AD onset, identifying AD onset via billing-purpose diagnosis and medication codes, grouping high-dimensional diagnosis codes into clinical comorbidities as confounding variables). We followed the data preparation process in our previous work (Ling et al, 2021) based on target trials (Hernán and Robins, 2016). We calculated the average treatment effect among treated (ATT) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) (Pearl, 2014, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%