2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf03031781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMU entry strategies for the new member states

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 The problem lies in the fact that the combination of convergence criteria creates a constraint affecting the compatibility of inflation targeting with the exchange rate convergence criterion embodied in the ERM2 arrangement. Arguments on this issue were voiced from various angles by Natalucci and Ravenna (2002), Buiter (2004), and de Grauwe and Schnabl (2004), among others. New EU members who currently operate under flexible exchange rate regimes and pursue inflation targeting may be confronted with an unpleasant policy shift in favor of exchange rate targeting when entering ERM2.…”
Section: Nominal-monetary Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The problem lies in the fact that the combination of convergence criteria creates a constraint affecting the compatibility of inflation targeting with the exchange rate convergence criterion embodied in the ERM2 arrangement. Arguments on this issue were voiced from various angles by Natalucci and Ravenna (2002), Buiter (2004), and de Grauwe and Schnabl (2004), among others. New EU members who currently operate under flexible exchange rate regimes and pursue inflation targeting may be confronted with an unpleasant policy shift in favor of exchange rate targeting when entering ERM2.…”
Section: Nominal-monetary Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent enlargement of the European Union by 11 countries mostly Central and Eastern European (CCE) countries (Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Malta, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia) heralds the enlargement of the EMU. Although some CCE countries are still outside the union, the new member states are obliged to join the EMU as soon as they fulfill the Maastricht criteria for monetary, fiscal and exchange rate convergence (Grauwe and Schnabl, 2011). One key aspect of the increased financial integration between old and new EU members has been the large capital inflows from older to newer economies.…”
Section: New Eu Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 This point is controversial. Others (see, for example, De Grauwe and Schnabl 2004) suggest that EMU membership would strengthen weak capital markets, reduce interest rates, and reinforce the already high degree of trade integration. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%