2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1662-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EmptyDrops: distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data

Abstract: Droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing protocols have dramatically increased the throughput of single-cell transcriptomics studies. A key computational challenge when processing these data is to distinguish libraries for real cells from empty droplets. Here, we describe a new statistical method for calling cells from droplet-based data, based on detecting significant deviations from the expression profile of the ambient solution. Using simulations, we demonstrate that EmptyDrops has greater power than existi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
564
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 674 publications
(566 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
564
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell-free RNA is present in the aqueous cell suspension, either as a result of normal biological processes or as a result of tissue dissociation, cell death, or other stresses experienced by cells during the isolation protocol which may cause cells to die or lyse. Such a mechanism has been proposed by others as well [1,4,10].…”
Section: Exhibitmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cell-free RNA is present in the aqueous cell suspension, either as a result of normal biological processes or as a result of tissue dissociation, cell death, or other stresses experienced by cells during the isolation protocol which may cause cells to die or lyse. Such a mechanism has been proposed by others as well [1,4,10].…”
Section: Exhibitmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A variety of heuristics are typically employed in order determine cutoffs for thresholding cells versus empty droplets. More principled approaches have recently been developed, including EmptyDrops [10], which uses statistical tests to ascertain which droplets have expression profiles significantly different from empty droplets, and DropEst [20], which distinguishes empty and non-empty droplets using a linear classifier trained on features extracted from a set of a priori known empty and non-empty droplets. These approaches, however, depend on having prior knowledge of a range of cell-free droplets (e.g.…”
Section: Accurate Detection Of Empty Dropletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alignment, read filtering, barcode and UMI counting were performed using kallisto-bustools 12 . High quality barcodes were selected based on the overall UMI distribution using emptyDrops 13 . All further analyses were run using the Python-based Scanpy 14 .…”
Section: Bioinformatic Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the cellRanger-atac method fits a mixture of two zero-inflated negative binomial models to discriminate cell barcodes and non-cell barcodes. EmptyDrops [41], originally designed to identify cells from scRNA-Seq data, models the counts using a Dirichlet-multinomial distribution. scATAC-pro provides all of the aforementioned strategies/methods.…”
Section: Cell Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%