2021
DOI: 10.1111/nae2.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empty systematic reviews: Identifying gaps in knowledge or a waste of time and effort?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the search resulted in no eligible studies identified in Garuda and Sinta databases, it is important to identify gaps in knowledge by reporting this result. (18) Afterward, the studies were exported to Mendeley Reference Manager software to remove 641 articles, and 970 remained. After removing 660 book chapters, conference abstracts, letters, commentary, encyclopedia, and other non-peer-reviewed articles, 310 articles remained for screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the search resulted in no eligible studies identified in Garuda and Sinta databases, it is important to identify gaps in knowledge by reporting this result. (18) Afterward, the studies were exported to Mendeley Reference Manager software to remove 641 articles, and 970 remained. After removing 660 book chapters, conference abstracts, letters, commentary, encyclopedia, and other non-peer-reviewed articles, 310 articles remained for screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search on vaginal dabbing yielded zero articles indicating an empty review on vaginal dabbing, that is, no eligible studies retrieved or located by the authors (see also Lang and colleagues 34–36 ). While this is not new, as 10% of reviews could be empty 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, such empty reviews should be expected and they are not useless. The most important essence of an empty review is that it identifies gaps in knowledge 36 . Evidence is the foundation of scientific practice and healthcare 37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, as stressed by Gray (2021), identifying only two studies in this review is nonetheless valuable for current L2 research because we can now be confident that there is little relevant research available. This means we can identify that researching whether MWUs in curricula and teaching have beneficial effects on young learners' L2 development is a muchneeded area of future research.…”
Section: Available Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%