Empowerment in adolescents and young adults with cancer: Relationship with health‐related quality of life

Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe difficulties adolescents and young adults (AYAs) encounter during a cancer experience may result in a reduction in or absence of empowerment. The aims of the current study were to assess levels of empowerment and associated (demographic, clinical, or psychological) factors and examine the association between empowerment and health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) among AYA patients with cancer.METHODSPatients aged 18 to 35 years at time of cancer diagnosis and who were seen by 1 of the members of the specialized multidisciplinary AYA team of the Radboud University Medical Center were invited to complete questionnaires regarding empowerment; HRQOL; and sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics (autonomy, coping, unmet social support needs, and psychological distress).RESULTSA total of 83 AYA patients completed the questionnaires. The mean age of the participants at the time of diagnosis was 27.5 years. The vast majority had been treated with chemotherapy (86%), had a more advanced stage of disease, and had completed treatment at the time of participation (74%). The mean empowerment level was 154.1 (standard deviation, 17.8) with a range of 114 to 200. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the autonomy subscales of self‐awareness (β = .35), capacity for managing new situations (β = .19), and social support (β = .35) were found to be positively associated with empowerment. Coping difficulties (β = ‐.19) were found to be negatively associated with empowerment. Empowerment was independently associated with physical (β = .31), psychological (β = .50), social (β = .39), religious (β = .33), and total HRQOL (β = .52; all P<.01).CONCLUSIONSLow levels of empowerment were associated with low levels of autonomy and social support, female sex, and coping difficulties among AYA patients with cancer. Recognizing these patients as candidates for empowerment interventions ultimately could help to improve HRQOL in late adolescence and young adulthood. Cancer 2017;123:4039‐47. © 2017 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Psychosocial issues for adolescent and young adult cancer patients in a global context: A forward‐looking approach

“…Patients in this age group therefore differ from younger children and older adults diagnosed with cancer, especially in terms of psychosocial needs. This remains true throughout a continuum of care that initiates with diagnosis and persists through phases of active treatment and transitions to post‐treatment survivorship or, in many cases, the end of life …”

Life satisfaction in young adults with cancer and the role of sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial factors: Results of a longitudinal study

“…25 Although to our knowledge associations between psychosocial factors and LS remain understudied, it is known that low levels of social support are associated with lower QOL. 26,27 Nevertheless, we still know very little regarding which factors associated with QOL remain stable over longer periods of time and therefore could potentially be good points of departure for psychooncological therapies. Thus, the objective of the current study was to describe overall LS in AYA patients with cancer by assessing multiple specific life domains at 2 time points, as well as to detect sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial factors associated with LS in AYA patients with cancer and which predictors remain stable.…”

Using Cocreation in the Process of Designing a Smartphone App for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Prototype Development Study (Preprint)

“…Cancer diagnosis is unsurprisingly a tremendous challenge that tests coping skills and personal agency. Co-creation addresses this by giving patients back the authority to address personal challenges via direct involvement in supportive resource creation, thus benefitting self-efficacy for both those involved in the process as well as the end-users [29]- [32].…”