2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11759-019-09357-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empowering Tribal Youth in Cultural Heritage Management: A Case Study from the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boley and Johnson (2016) found that empowerment is often characterized by residents perceiving themselves as being more connected to the community and willing to work together toward common goals [68]. Guilfoyle et al (2019) emphasized the empowerment that fosters relationships and connections with cultural landscapes and heritage [69]. More importantly, the local public has the rights and obligations of heritage management in the practice of cultural heritage sustainability, which can preserve the local spirit for future generations.…”
Section: Landscape Narrative Integration Into Local Heritage Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boley and Johnson (2016) found that empowerment is often characterized by residents perceiving themselves as being more connected to the community and willing to work together toward common goals [68]. Guilfoyle et al (2019) emphasized the empowerment that fosters relationships and connections with cultural landscapes and heritage [69]. More importantly, the local public has the rights and obligations of heritage management in the practice of cultural heritage sustainability, which can preserve the local spirit for future generations.…”
Section: Landscape Narrative Integration Into Local Heritage Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2019; Guilfoyle et al. 2019; Mrozowski and Gould 2019), there are attendant discussions (often in the same articles) of the logistical, ethical, and professional issues hindering the emancipatory promise of coproduced, transepistemic archaeology. For example, González‐Ruibal (2019) considers the ethical predicaments archaeologists face when the Indigenous communities they work with or wish to work with do not espouse anticapitalist positions (can their participation still further decolonization?)…”
Section: Indigenous Archaeologies and Epistemic Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current methodologies on biodiversity in urban centres focus on the study of building heights [ 14 ], green areas [ 20 , 26 ], hydraulic infrastructures [ 6 , 27 , 28 ] and groundwater [ 29 ]. While data collection can be performed through on-site analysis, behavioural mapping and surveys [ 30 ] other research uses indicators theoretically to contrast information on the inclusion and collaboration of local residents in conservation projects [ 31 , 32 ]. Furthermore, certain indicators are used to quantify the benefits of biodiversity on human health [ 18 , 33 , 34 ], land-use change [ 35 , 36 ] and the impact of nature conservation on the provision of ecosystem services [ 8 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%