Empowering policies for grassroots welfare initiatives: Blending social innovation and commons theory

Bianchi, Iolanda

doi:10.1177/09697764221129532

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 42 publications

(74 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, other work on mutual aid and common infrastructures has suggested that they are rarely free of institutional entanglements, from their very inception. Writing about the forms of care and politics that were forged in Barcelona in response to post-Global Financial Crisis austerity, Bianchi (2022aBianchi ( , 2022b argues that mutual aid and other urban commons initiatives are often sustained by forms of state support that are frequently unrecognised. Similarly, Gibson-Grahamet al (2016, p. 207) see commoning initiatives such as mutual aid taking the form of assemblages that "may include social movements and grass-roots organisations but also governments, institutions and firms; they may include non-market mechanisms but also markets ….…”

Section: Mutual Aid As Care Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

Navigating the dilemmas of mutual aid: International student organising in Sydney during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Iveson,

Riboldi

2024

Geographical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2020, thousands of international students found themselves stranded in Sydney, Australia, with the suspension of international travel and closure of borders. While many lost their livelihoods due to lockdowns, the Australian government excluded international students and other temporary visa holders from all forms of income support and disaster relief—resulting in food and housing insecurity and social isolation. This article describes and analyses the forms of mutual aid and support that international students organised to address their situation. In providing an account of their efforts, we consider them as forms of care infrastructure and draw particular attention to the institutional relationships that were involved: interfaces with faith, community and labour organising; confrontations with state agencies and the higher education sector; and institutionalisation into a formalised and state‐funded community organising initiative—the Oz International Student Hub. We examine the evolution of these relationships as responses to a series of strategic dilemmas, as students sought simultaneously to care for one another and to confront the forces that produced their precarity and isolation. And we draw out a series of lessons can we learn from their efforts about how mutual aid can avoid the pitfalls of charity and state welfare, while institutionalising more durable political spaces that do not have to be invented anew with each fresh crisis.

show abstract

Section: Mutual Aid As Care Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%