2015
DOI: 10.1108/pr-01-2014-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empowering and trustful leadership: impact on nurses’ commitment

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the impact of workplace empowerment and staff nurses’ perceptions of trustworthiness in their supervisor as determinators of organizational commitment. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 189 nurses working at Portuguese public hospitals. Findings – Results indicate that an empowering work context was significant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with other forms of organizational commitment among nurses in the present study, structural empowerment appeared to have the strongest partial correlation with affective commitment. This provides additional empirical support to the large body of scholarly papers demonstrating the value of affective organizational commitment as having the strongest and most consistent relationship with desirable organizational outcomes (Freire & Azevedo, 2015;Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Saudisupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In comparison with other forms of organizational commitment among nurses in the present study, structural empowerment appeared to have the strongest partial correlation with affective commitment. This provides additional empirical support to the large body of scholarly papers demonstrating the value of affective organizational commitment as having the strongest and most consistent relationship with desirable organizational outcomes (Freire & Azevedo, 2015;Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Saudisupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The initial search revealed 204 studies which after applying the inclusion criteria where reduced to 23, after checking the title, abstract, and full texts (Aggarwal et al, 2018;Ahmad & Oranye, 2010;Chang, Shih, & Lin, 2010;Cho, Laschinger, & Wong, 2006;Choi & Ahn, 2016;Church, He, & Yarbrough, 2018;Cowden & Cummings, 2015;Dahinten et al, 2014;DeCicco, Laschinger, & Kerr, 2006;Eskandari, Siahkali, Shoghli, Pazargadi, & Tafreshi, 2017;Freire & Azevedo, 2015;Ibrahem et al, 2013;Laschinger & Finegan, 2005;Laschinger et al, 2002Laschinger et al, , 2009McDermott et al, 1996;Park, Park, Yom, & Kim, 2006;Smith, Andrusyszyn, & Spence laschinger, 2010;Spence Laschinger, Leiter, Day, & Gilin, 2009;Wilson & Laschinger, 1994;Yang et al, 2014;Yang, Liu, Huang, & Zhu, 2013;Young-Ritchie, Spence Laschinger, & Wong, 2009). One study was further excluded during analysis, because of an extremely small standard deviation (Park et al, 2006).…”
Section: Search Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuvaas and Dysvik (2009) found that investment in temporary employee development was positively related to social exchange, which in turn motivates higher levels of organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. Generally, previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between empowerment and organizational commitment (Baker, 2000;Freire & Azevedo, 2015;Humborstad & Perry, 2011;Jandaghi, Borghei, Matin, & Dastani, 2010).…”
Section: Psychological Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Despite the growing importance of commitment to the supervisor, relatively few studies have empirically investigated the consequences of this construct (Chughtai, 2013) and its causes, especially in the context of contract type. Second, the relationship between empowerment and organizational commitment has been extensively studied (Freire & Azevedo, 2015; Humborstad & Perry, 2011). However, the level of empowerment of temporary employees remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%