“…This finding confirms the proposition by Louis et al (1989) that the entrepreneurial initiative of creating companies has a negative relationship with academic activity, measured by the number of publications. One possible explanation for this behavior is the global trend for PhDs to seek professional positions in their own universities, based on teaching and research (Bin et al, 2015). This situation is not only the reflection of a tradition in PhD s educationlargely centered on the self-reproduction of the academic modelbut the lack of opportunities to work in sectors other than education, especially in developing countries and the lack of encouragement for entrepreneurship (both in terms of public policies and the way PhD education takes place).…”
Purpose -This paper aims to understand, in the state of São Paulo academic environment, the differences between the profiles of academic entrepreneurs, nonacademic entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs.Design/methodology/approach -The authors collected data from a more comprehensive research, whose objective was to evaluate the scholarship programmes of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). For data collection, the authors used an online questionnaire, pre-filled with information from the Lattes Curriculum of the sample individuals, as well as information obtained from FAPESP and from coordination for the improvement of higher education personnel. The response rate of the questionnaires was 21 per cent. The authors sought to explore the variables regarding entrepreneurial activities carried out by former scholarship holders, by relating them to other key variables identified in the literature review and explained in the hypotheses.Findings -The results indicate that entrepreneurship rates decrease with the higher academic level of the researcher; in general, academic entrepreneurs come from families with a good financial situation, and applied sciences are the areas of knowledge with more entrepreneurs.
“…This finding confirms the proposition by Louis et al (1989) that the entrepreneurial initiative of creating companies has a negative relationship with academic activity, measured by the number of publications. One possible explanation for this behavior is the global trend for PhDs to seek professional positions in their own universities, based on teaching and research (Bin et al, 2015). This situation is not only the reflection of a tradition in PhD s educationlargely centered on the self-reproduction of the academic modelbut the lack of opportunities to work in sectors other than education, especially in developing countries and the lack of encouragement for entrepreneurship (both in terms of public policies and the way PhD education takes place).…”
Purpose -This paper aims to understand, in the state of São Paulo academic environment, the differences between the profiles of academic entrepreneurs, nonacademic entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs.Design/methodology/approach -The authors collected data from a more comprehensive research, whose objective was to evaluate the scholarship programmes of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). For data collection, the authors used an online questionnaire, pre-filled with information from the Lattes Curriculum of the sample individuals, as well as information obtained from FAPESP and from coordination for the improvement of higher education personnel. The response rate of the questionnaires was 21 per cent. The authors sought to explore the variables regarding entrepreneurial activities carried out by former scholarship holders, by relating them to other key variables identified in the literature review and explained in the hypotheses.Findings -The results indicate that entrepreneurship rates decrease with the higher academic level of the researcher; in general, academic entrepreneurs come from families with a good financial situation, and applied sciences are the areas of knowledge with more entrepreneurs.
“…Bin et al (2015) studied the experiences and perspectives of Brazilian doctorate holders [15]. Waaijer et al (2016) investigated whether the longevity of doctorate recipients' publication careers has changed in the United States.…”
Nowadays, doctorate holders are not only academicians and researchers, but they also play roles across a broad ground of working areas within society. These areas are versatile and increasing in way. The aim of this study is to make statistical evaluation of careers of doctorate holders survey using the correspondence analysis with supplementary variables. The focus of this paper is doctorate holders in Turkey. A survey regarding this matter was carried out by Turkish Statistical Institute. This survey includes various questions such as gender, age, employment situation, field of science, etc. Using correspondence analysis we investigated doctorate holders in relation to their gender and employment situation and employment sector. How the employment situation of doctorate holders changes according to gender and year of doctorate award; and doctorate holders' satisfaction level on their principal job by selected title have been shown.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.