Employment related barriers and facilitators for people with psychiatric disabilities in Spain

Lettieri, Andrea; Villoria, Emiliano Díez; Soto-Pérez, Felipe; Bernate-Navarro, Mara

doi:10.3233/wor-213642

Cited by 10 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our interviews with participants in search of work, structural barriers (such as selfstigma, social isolation, and con icting relationships) were more frequently mentioned than COVID-19related issues. This might be the result of structural and longer existing barriers, which were also described in other studies apart from the COVID-19 crisis [24][25][26] and which in turn became even more prominent in times of social distancing and reduced social support. However, these ndings might also indicate that structural barriers are more impactful for this group of job seekers than the additional COVID-19-related problems.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Work and health during the COVID-19 crisis among Dutch workers and jobseekers with (partial) work disabilities: A mixed methods study

Visser

Anema

Huysmans

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The consequences of restrictive measures during the COVID-19 outbreak have potentially been enormous, especially for those in a vulnerable position in the labour market. This study aims to describe the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on work status, working conditions, and health among people with (partial) work disabilities—with and in search of work—during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Methods: A mixed methods design was used, combining a cross-sectional online survey and ten semi-structured interviews with people with a (partial) work disability. The quantitative data included responses to job-related questions, self-reported health, and demographics. The qualitative data consisted of participants’ perceptions about work, vocational rehabilitation, and health. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the responses, conducted logistic and linear regression and integrated our qualitative findings with the quantitative findings, aiming at complementarity. Results: Five hundred and eighty-four participants (response rate 30.2%) completed the online survey. The majority of participants experienced no change in work status: 39 percent remained employed, 45 percent remained unemployed, six percent of respondents lost their job, and ten percent became employed during the COVID-19 crisis. In general, the results showed a deterioration in self-rated health during the COVID-19 outbreak, both for participants at work and in search of work. Participants who lost their job during the COVID-19 crisis reported the highest deterioration in self-rated health. Interview findings revealed that loneliness and social isolation were persistent during the COVID-19 crisis, especially among those in search of work. Additionally, employed participants identified a safe work environment and the possibility to work at the office as important factors for overall health. Conclusions: The vast majority of study participants (84.2%) experienced no change in work status during the COVID-19 crisis. Nonetheless, people at work and in search of work encountered barriers to maintaining or (re)gaining employment. People with a (partial) work disability who lost their job during the crisis appeared to be most affected in terms of health. Employment and health protections could be strengthened for persons with WD to better prepare them for the next crisis.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Work and health during the COVID-19 crisis among Dutch workers and jobseekers with (partial) work disabilities: A mixed methods study

Visser

Anema

Huysmans

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, awareness about SCZ and other such mental illnesses may be increased through workplace seminars and coaching which could help in refuting the notion that SCZ individuals are not capable of working. Sensitizing of employers on issues of mental health may help in improving employment opportunities and conditions for SCZ individuals (Henry and Lucca, 2004). There is a general lack of understanding regarding SCZ and mental illness among employers, managers and supervisors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A relational perspective of schizophrenia at work

Khalid

Syed²

2022

EDI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeDespite a plethora of research on diversity and inclusion, workplace-related issues pertaining to individuals with schizophrenia (SCZ) remain grossly underexplored. This paper seeks to develop a relational, multilevel perspective of issues and challenges faced by individuals with SCZ in the work and career.Design/methodology/approachThe research draws on the findings from in-depth, qualitative interviews with schizophrenic individuals, individuals’ family members, healthcare professionals and nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives.FindingsThe findings highlight the interconnected nature of multilevel issues faced by schizophrenic individuals and indicate that at the societal level, social stigma, economic conditions and inadequate government policies are the key challenges faced by them. At the organizational level workplace support and job suitability and design affect individuals’ employment. At the individual level, self-stigma affects the employability in a negative way whereas personal motivation and resilience, family and social support and realization of illness are the facilitating factors.Originality/valueThe study adds to disability and diversity literature by developing a relational perspective that holistically captures the issues faced by schizophrenic individuals and suggests that the work and employment-related issues may be simultaneously addressed at multiple levels.

show abstract

“…The employers’ opinions, and those of family, friends, and medical and non‐medical mental health professionals, can be crucial for both returning to work and work inclusion of people with psychiatric disabilities (Lettieri et al., 2022 ). Research on the attitudes of mental health professionals toward the employability of people with mental illness, as well as the stakeholders involved in promoting and supporting employment for these people, provide important insight for addressing this issue.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This issue has great importance because medical mental health professionals have an important counseling role in supporting people with mental illness recovery, and there are studies that show how the opinions of these staff may discourage people from working (Costa et al., 2017 ; Noel et al., 2017 ; Roets et al., 2007 ). The negative expectations and fears about the worsening of mental health because of work is an important barrier reported by people with psychiatric disabilities too, and mental health professionals may have a negative effect confirming and sharing this belief (Lettieri et al., 2022 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The attitudes of mental health professionals on the employability of people with mental illness: A different view limiting employment rehabilitation

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Mental health professionals are becoming increasingly involved in the process of employment rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities. However, few studies address the attitudes of these professionals toward the employability of those with mental illness. The aim of this research was to identify differences in the attitudes of medical and non‐medical mental health professionals, as well as to detect any association between attitude scores and the type of professional. Methods A sample of 140 employees from public and third sector mental health organizations answered a questionnaire using a scale measuring their attitudes and views on the employability of people with psychiatric disabilities. The psychometric characteristics of the scale are provided together with the variations detected in the professionals’ attitudes. Results This research shows that significant differences in the attitudes between medical and non‐medical mental health employees exist and that there is a need for the implementation of educational programs that may help to improve the attitudes of medical professionals toward the employability of people with mental illness. Conclusion This research indicates the importance of improving the professionals’ attitudes to support people attempting to return to work.

show abstract

Employment related barriers and facilitators for people with psychiatric disabilities in Spain

Cited by 10 publications

References 41 publications

Work and health during the COVID-19 crisis among Dutch workers and jobseekers with (partial) work disabilities: A mixed methods study

Work and health during the COVID-19 crisis among Dutch workers and jobseekers with (partial) work disabilities: A mixed methods study

A relational perspective of schizophrenia at work

The attitudes of mental health professionals on the employability of people with mental illness: A different view limiting employment rehabilitation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About