2012
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment of Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis and After Kidney Transplant: A Cross-sectional Study From Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
96
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many possible factors infusing employment status were reported such as age, gender, education levels, lifestyle, dialysis modality, medical insurance, serum albumin, anemia, physical and psychological functioning, disease etiology(diabetes), availability of late-shift dialysis, training, and high-frequency hemodialysis [9,10,[17][18][19][20][21]. However, in our study, we observed that only increasing age, lower educational level, and higher annual income were identified as independent risk factors for loss of employment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many possible factors infusing employment status were reported such as age, gender, education levels, lifestyle, dialysis modality, medical insurance, serum albumin, anemia, physical and psychological functioning, disease etiology(diabetes), availability of late-shift dialysis, training, and high-frequency hemodialysis [9,10,[17][18][19][20][21]. However, in our study, we observed that only increasing age, lower educational level, and higher annual income were identified as independent risk factors for loss of employment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effect was probably negligible, given that ESRD patients in Taiwan are eligible for dialysis free of charge, and few patients undergoing dialysis would choose to emigrate. Second, neither the lifetime expenses not paid by the NHI (for example, monthly transportation fees and costs for caregivers employed) nor the work status of the patients [the employment rate in PD patients is generally higher (29)] was included in the study. Transportation expenditures incurred by a family member or members accompanying a patient during HD may also directly or indirectly affect the cost of care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a crosssectional study of patients included in the Finnish Registry of Kidney Diseases, the probability of being in employment was considerably higher for patients receiving HHD (the majority of whom were receiving intensive therapy) than for those receiving incentre CHD (adjusted rela tive risk 1.87). 90 If calculation of this monetary benefit were achievable, increased evidence of an overall cost benefit might be expected, which would provide a strong economic argument in favour of IHHD. Despite the deficiencies of these cost-benefit models they remain the best such data we have.…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%