2013
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employing MCMC under the PPL framework to analyze sequence data in large pedigrees

Abstract: The increased feasibility of whole-genome (or whole-exome) sequencing has led to renewed interest in using family data to find disease mutations. For clinical phenotypes that lend themselves to study in large families, this approach can be particularly effective, because it may be possible to obtain strong evidence of a causal mutation segregating in a single pedigree even under conditions of extreme locus and/or allelic heterogeneity at the population level. In this paper, we extend our capacity to carry out … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KELVIN is also capable of handling large pedigrees, so we were able to keep the very large families intact. Multipoint linkage analysis was done using a unique “hybrid” approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for the marker data 19 and exact likelihood calculations for the trait data 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KELVIN is also capable of handling large pedigrees, so we were able to keep the very large families intact. Multipoint linkage analysis was done using a unique “hybrid” approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for the marker data 19 and exact likelihood calculations for the trait data 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linkage analysis was conducted using the software package KELVIN (v2.4.9), which implements the PPL (posterior probability of linkage) class of models for measuring the strength of genetic evidence [ 34 ]. In order to take advantage of the very dense marker coverage in a multipoint setting, and given the size of the pedigrees, MCMC was used to calculate marker likelihoods as described in [ 35 ], while KELVIN’s non-stochastic algorithm was used to calculate trait likelihoods conditional on marker data [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shown here are results for the posterior probability of linkage (PPL) statistic; for comparison purposes, NPL [7] results as calculated by Merlin are shown in Supplement 2, for the 45 pedigrees Merlin was able to process. (Kelvin performed exact (full) multipoint calculations for these 45 pedigrees and utilized a hybrid MCMC-exact likelihood for the remaining 2 pedigrees [8]. ) Prior to analysis marker allele frequencies were estimated using maximum likelihood.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%