2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employing ionic liquids to deposit cellulose on PET fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, compared with [Amim]­Cl, the melting point of [Emim]­Cl is as high as 74 °C. At the initial stage of dissolution, [Emim]­Cl would produce higher shear stress in the process of dissolution of cellulose, causing more severe damage to the molecular chain. , In addition, the DP value of WCF-[Emim]­OAc was lower than that of WCF-[Emim]­DEP. This phenomenon is due to OAc – based ILs having a higher π*, which was attributed to breaking more molecular chains, resulting in more severe degradation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, compared with [Amim]­Cl, the melting point of [Emim]­Cl is as high as 74 °C. At the initial stage of dissolution, [Emim]­Cl would produce higher shear stress in the process of dissolution of cellulose, causing more severe damage to the molecular chain. , In addition, the DP value of WCF-[Emim]­OAc was lower than that of WCF-[Emim]­DEP. This phenomenon is due to OAc – based ILs having a higher π*, which was attributed to breaking more molecular chains, resulting in more severe degradation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water absorption was determined according to DIN 53923. 10 The textile samples (10 × 10 cm) were fixed on a perforated plate test sieve and then placed on the bottom of a basin filled with water, using slanted immersion to avoid the development of air bubbles below the fabric sample. The samples were kept in the water for 1 min before they were removed (still fixed on the perforated plate test sieve), three of the needles holding the sample were removed, and the perforated plate test sieve was fixed horizontally, allowing the fabric to hang for 3 min (to remove the water excess) before it was weighed again.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be observed that the resistance depends on the processing speed and its value at 1.4 m/s is on average 2.4% higher than at 1.0 m/s. This could be related to abrasion of the finishing [14], that can be seen in the SEM images (Table 2). It is exemplified that the fibres of the reference yarn have a strong adhesion and are closer to each other than after processing which led to the slight separation for all three feed variants FV I-III.…”
Section: Yarn Damagementioning
confidence: 98%