This book highlights the different technology transfer (TT) models that have been tried over the last two decades, and the factors that affect successful efforts to change organizations and implement EBP. The discussion also highlights those factors that are less important to implementation. These lessons are especially pertinent to the corrections fi eld where attention to evidence-based practice (EBP) requires the recognition of a new goal related to offender change as well as embracing offender change as an integral part of the primary mission of public safety. Given the emphasis on offender accountability as a dominant public safety theme, the recent interest in de-incarceration policies provides an opportunity for correctional programming to embrace treatment and offender change. A major shift in corrections policy and practice appears imminent (Taxman, 2011 ) . And, given that few corrections agencies have staff to provide addiction treatment services, building inner setting capacity is needed. More attention must be given to goal clarifi cation and infrastructure as critical ingredients of the change process.Prior chapters laid the foundation for a specifi c TT model tailored to the unique and complex environment(s) of community corrections. Chapters 3 and 4 sculpted the groundwork for the components of a TT model while Chap. 8 underscored the need for a process to translate and synthesize the research to produce content that is usable in practice. A dynamic TT model has different layers to manipulate the transfer process including attention to the innovation (intervention), the inner organization such as mission/goal, managers, staff, and administrators, and the outer setting of stakeholders, constituency, and policymakers. The lessons gleaned from prior efforts are that community corrections should pay attention to addiction treatment organizations and other external stakeholders to support the goal of offender change. Collectively it is important to improve the capacity of agencies to handle the change processes. For the inner setting, it is important to consider the attitudes, perspectives and skills of all organizational actors such as staff and managers. Building knowledge is critical to forming a strong foundation and garnering confi dence in the capability of the organization. For the outer setting, it is important to impart knowledge about the value of the innovation, identify areas of support, work on integrating