2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2021.101150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employer-provided training and productivity: Evidence from a panel of Japanese Firms

Abstract: This study presents evidence on the quantitative relationship between employer-provided training and productivity among Japanese firms. The important contributions of this study are its construction of a panel of training stock at the firm-level, its distinction between manufacturing and service firms, and its comparison of the relative contribution of training to productivity and wages. The results indicate, first, that training significantly contributes to the labor productivity of the firm. Second, the esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Dearden et al (2006) estimated that a 1 percentage point (pp) increase in the fraction of workers receiving training increased valueadded per worker by about 0.6% and average wages by 0.3% for firms in the UK, and Konings and Vanormelingen (2015) estimated a 1pp increase in the fraction of workers trained increased productivity by 0.17-0.32%, and average wages by 0.1-0.17% for Belgium firms. In contrast, recent evidence by Morikawa (2021) for Japan finds training has low but similar e↵ects on both productivity and wages, with elasticities of about 0.02. Our study adds to the literature by showing the gap between MPL and wages based on individual employee level data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For example, Dearden et al (2006) estimated that a 1 percentage point (pp) increase in the fraction of workers receiving training increased valueadded per worker by about 0.6% and average wages by 0.3% for firms in the UK, and Konings and Vanormelingen (2015) estimated a 1pp increase in the fraction of workers trained increased productivity by 0.17-0.32%, and average wages by 0.1-0.17% for Belgium firms. In contrast, recent evidence by Morikawa (2021) for Japan finds training has low but similar e↵ects on both productivity and wages, with elasticities of about 0.02. Our study adds to the literature by showing the gap between MPL and wages based on individual employee level data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For China, Liu and Lu (2016) found a statistically and economically significant positive impact of training on firm productivity and workers' wages for large and medium‐sized manufacturing firms. Hence, upgrading human capital via employee training is an essential economic policy to enhance productivity (Morikawa, 2021). Such training helps improve human capital within an organization, leading to higher technical efficiency since employee knowledge, skills, and abilities are thus enhanced.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Some Sdg Indicators On Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los hallazgos revelan que la capacitación aporta significativamente a la productividad de la mano de obra de modo específico en las empresas del sector servicios. Las elasticidades de las actividades de capacitación en función del salario y la productividad son iguales en tamaño a los rendimientos de las inversiones pensadas desde el valor agregado (Morikawa, 2021).…”
Section: Binomio Capacitación Y Productividadunclassified