2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee scheduling with short demand perturbations and extensible shifts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) Using real-life data (daily call arrivals in 6 months of 2020) and synthetic data (capabilities of devices), we experimentally verify the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed method. Compared with five stateof-the-art methods for task scheduling, i.e., linear programming (LP [21]), integer programming (IP [22]), MIP [16]), improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO [23]), and multiobjective evolutionary algorithm-based decomposition (MOEAD [24]), we find that PACAM is at least two orders of magnitude faster than the above methods.…”
Section: Motivation Example (Internet Of Vehicle)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) Using real-life data (daily call arrivals in 6 months of 2020) and synthetic data (capabilities of devices), we experimentally verify the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed method. Compared with five stateof-the-art methods for task scheduling, i.e., linear programming (LP [21]), integer programming (IP [22]), MIP [16]), improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO [23]), and multiobjective evolutionary algorithm-based decomposition (MOEAD [24]), we find that PACAM is at least two orders of magnitude faster than the above methods.…”
Section: Motivation Example (Internet Of Vehicle)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this section, we experimentally evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of our proposed solution PACAM against the state-of-the-art methods. We implement our algorithm in Python and adopt the Python implementation of all competitors based on the following methods: (1) LP [21], (2) IP [22], (3) MIP [16], (4) IPSO [23], and ( 5) MOEAD [24]. e solver used in this article is Gurobi solver 9.1 [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, uncertain events, such as short demand perturbations arising from staff absenteeism or customer surge, would cause original employee schedules perform poorly. Motivated by the uncertain factors, there are a growing attentions on accounting for random employee demand in the scheduling models [15], [19]- [23], especially in the context of employee plans in retail stores [10], [24], [25]. In particular, Bürgy et al [25] studies the employee scheduling problem considering uncertain demand arising in retail stores, and their strategy to cope with uncertain demand is assigning overtime work by extending shifts to cope with a lack of employees in real-time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the uncertain factors, there are a growing attentions on accounting for random employee demand in the scheduling models [15], [19]- [23], especially in the context of employee plans in retail stores [10], [24], [25]. In particular, Bürgy et al [25] studies the employee scheduling problem considering uncertain demand arising in retail stores, and their strategy to cope with uncertain demand is assigning overtime work by extending shifts to cope with a lack of employees in real-time. Similar to the proposed methodology used in our work, Kim and Mehrotra [21] addresses the problem of integrated nurse staffing and scheduling under demand uncertainty in a two-stage stochastic modeling fashion.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…workforce scheduling) helps them to understand one of the core business processes in advisory firms for pursuing effectiveness and efficiency (Dodin, 1999). Furthermore, workforce scheduling is critical in many services organisations in controlling costs and satisfying customers and clients (see Burgy et al, 2019; Ernst et al, 2004; Ruiz-Torres et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%