“…Although not extensive, there has been a steady flow of published EAP evaluations though the majority remain more basic case studies (Csiernik, 2005(Csiernik, , 2011. Peer-reviewed studies have used a vast array of data collection techniques ranging from self-report telephone surveys (Masi & Jacobson, 2003), to cross sectional studies (Sieberhagen, Pienaar, & Els, 2011), to purposive samples of supervisors (Orren & Terblanche, 2009), to matched cohort studies (Hughes, Elkin, & Epstein, 2004;Thompson et al, 2005), to qualitative surveys and secondary data analysis (Wang, Lin, & Sha, 2014). Although this illustrates the creativity of those conducting EAP evaluations, there is also value in having a degree of consistency when conducting program evaluation within a field.…”