2017
DOI: 10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i7/3179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee Participation in Decision Making: A Correlate of Employee Citizenship Behaviour and Counterproductive Workplace Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theory Z promotes participative decision-making arrangement and suggest that management should seek to ascertain a participative decision-making system that ensures a high level of commitment and dedication from the workers. Researchers argued that those employees having the opportunity to take part in the decision-making process might be committed and show respect to the decisions made since they are also part of those decisions (Akkas et al, 2015;Jackson, 1983;Reeves, Walsh, Tuller, & Magley, 2012;Rosemary, Nnaemeka, & Etodike, 2017). Thus, we can hypothesize that consensus decision making has a significant relation with managing people at work (H3).…”
Section: The Asian Journal Of Professional and Business Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Theory Z promotes participative decision-making arrangement and suggest that management should seek to ascertain a participative decision-making system that ensures a high level of commitment and dedication from the workers. Researchers argued that those employees having the opportunity to take part in the decision-making process might be committed and show respect to the decisions made since they are also part of those decisions (Akkas et al, 2015;Jackson, 1983;Reeves, Walsh, Tuller, & Magley, 2012;Rosemary, Nnaemeka, & Etodike, 2017). Thus, we can hypothesize that consensus decision making has a significant relation with managing people at work (H3).…”
Section: The Asian Journal Of Professional and Business Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Counterproductive work behaviour poses significant challenges to organizations worldwide, and Nigeria is no exception. CWB refers to actions or behaviours by employees that undermine their own productivity or the productivity of others within the organization (Ike, Ezeh & Etodike, 2017). It is crucial for organizations to understanding the nature, causes, and consequences of CWB in the Nigerian context and to address them to foster a productive work environment.…”
Section: Counterproductive Work Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CWB can be categorized into two main types: behaviours targeted at the organization and behaviours targeted at individuals. Ike, Ezeh & Etodike (2017) showed a detailed classification comprising five (5) dimensions: abuse, production deviance, sabotage, theft, and withdrawal. Various factors contribute to the occurrence of CWB among workers.…”
Section: Counterproductive Work Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employee involvement participation in organizational duties inspires them and enable them to contribute more rapidly (Demir & Budur, 2021). It reflects their attitude towards work and their level of identification with their employment (Ike et al, 2017). Employees with high 4 involvement are more likely to strive for organizational goals and less likely to contribute to turnover (Abubakar et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%