2014
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00187-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee Motivation from Performance Appraisal Implications: Test of a Theory in the Software Industry in West Bengal (India)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To have a comprehensive understanding of employee motivation, one must examine its history, as well as further development, because employee motivation and engagement has long been a major concern for research (Sanyal and Biswas 2014). When Frederick Herzberg researched the sources of employee motivation during the 1950s and 1960s, he discovered a dichotomy: the things that make people satisfied and motivated on the job are different, in kind, from the things that make them dissatisfied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To have a comprehensive understanding of employee motivation, one must examine its history, as well as further development, because employee motivation and engagement has long been a major concern for research (Sanyal and Biswas 2014). When Frederick Herzberg researched the sources of employee motivation during the 1950s and 1960s, he discovered a dichotomy: the things that make people satisfied and motivated on the job are different, in kind, from the things that make them dissatisfied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the literature shows that task derivative, growth latitude, recognition agreement, innovation reinforcement, empowerment, tolerant culture (Gopala and Tripathy, 2015) are much more imperative than financial agreements, which indicates a clear proclivity towards Herzberg's motivator factors among the highly educated, skilled dynamic academic workforce (Nosraty et al, 2015) in countries like India (Sanyal and Biswas, 2014). In absence of proper quantifying techniques, so far the evaluators interpreted these data based on their own judgment and personal bias (Moers, 2005).…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viewing the conventional procedure for appraising the performance of academic staff in institutions of higher learning from a different humanistic angle, Sanyal and Biswas (2014) have criticised the existing system for not taking note of emotional quotients like, tribal sentiment, social and political factors and even personal emotions and mood swings associated with both the employer and employee. Such situation may lead to bias in the system and further deteriorate the performance of the affected employee.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, performance is the result of work [4,5] and the appraisal aims to diagnose, evaluate and improve gradually such performance [6]. Performance appraisal intends to always answer two questions [7]: "what things are not going as they should?"…”
Section: The Importance Of Performance Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To implement a performance evaluation process it is necessary to reflect carefully on the objectives to achieve and the procedures to follow, defining when, who and how to intervene in the evaluation [11]. The performance appraisal process should be based on the close proximity of the appraiser and the assessed: this proximity enables a better performance appraisal and provides a fast and effective feedback to the assessed [5].…”
Section: The Importance Of Performance Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%