Employee Exposure to Coworker Substance Use and Negative Consequences: The Moderating Effects of Work Group Membership

Bennett, Joel B.; Lehman, Wayne E. K.

doi:10.2307/2676354

Cited by 23 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When model 1 was estimated without any neighbor or neighborhood measures (not shown), the neighborhood-level variance (r 2 ) was estimated to be r 2 = 0.13 ( p < 0.05), indicating significant unexplained variation between neighborhoods in marriage rates. Examining how r 2 changes from this baseline model as additional predictors are added is a common way of observing which measures are explaining between-cluster variation (e.g., Boardman, Powers, Padilla, & Hummer, 2002;Bennett & Lehman, 1999;Teachman & Crowder, 2002). Adding to this model the measure of the neighborhood's average distance to neighborhood institutions and services reduced the neighborhood-level variance to r 2 = 0.10 ( p < 0.05), a reduction of about 23% from r 2 = 0.13 (not shown).…”

Section: Neighborhoodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neighbors and neighborhoods: effects on marriage timing

Yabiku

2006

Popul Res Policy Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies of neighborhoods can benefit from data and theoretical frameworks that allow them to examine the differences between neighborhoods and neighbors. Without this distinction, it is unclear if it is characteristics of the people or the place that are associated with individual outcomes. Using data from the Chitwan Valley Family Study, I explore the differences between neighbors and neighborhoods and their associations with marriage timing. I hypothesize three mechanisms whereby neighbors influence individuals: information sharing, social modeling, and sanctions and rewards among a close primary residential group. I explore three domains in which these mechanisms are likely to operate: education, media consumption, and attitudes. Results indicate that when neighbors have attitudes favoring later marriage and being single, marriage rates decrease, even when controlling for measures that describe the neighborhood’s access to important resources in the form of institutions and services. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006Marriage, Neighborhoods, Neighbors, Nepal, Social change,

show abstract

Section: Neighborhoodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neighbors and neighborhoods: effects on marriage timing

Yabiku

2006

Popul Res Policy Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(12,13) Binge drinking may be affected by work-related mechanisms like social networks (14) and job stress that vary across occupations. (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) As a result, occupations, after adjusting for confounding worker characteristics, may be associated with higher or lower binge drinking risk. Results from studies on heavy alcohol use have found that employees in service and sales had elevated risk.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Occupation as an Independent Risk Factor for Binge Drinking

Barnes

Brown

2012

The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Central to the Team Awareness model is that work environments involve risk factors and protective factors. Risk factors include safety-related occupations (e.g., Ames & Grube, 1999;Lehman et al, 1995;Lund et al, 1991) and drinking climate (Bennett & Lehman, 1999;Greenburg & Gruneberg, 1995), whereas protective factors include social integration (Trice & Sonnenstuhl, 1990) and organizational wellness (e.g., Quick, 1999;Rosen, 1991).…”

Section: Team Awareness Programmentioning

confidence: 99%

Young Adults in the Workplace: A Multisite Initiative of Substance Use Prevention Programs

Bray¹,

Galvin²,

Cluff³

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The results and analyses discussed in this book are based on research supported by the Young Adults in the Workplace (YIW) initiative, funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). A great number of colleagues, researchers, and federal staff were invaluable in the development and implementation of our work. We are indebted to our YIW workplace partners, who implemented the programs described in these chapters, and to the grantees who contributed the framework, evaluation, and positive energy to explore with us new methods in substance abuse prevention for a younger workforce. Organizational leaders and frontline managers provided the critical support needed to obtain employee participation and worked to frame and implement the new ideas through health/wellness and traditional drug-free workplace programs. Special thanks goes to the YIW Steering Committee, reviewers, and production staff who contributed a great deal to the content, organization, and readability of the book.

show abstract

Employee Exposure to Coworker Substance Use and Negative Consequences: The Moderating Effects of Work Group Membership

Cited by 23 publications

References 40 publications

Neighbors and neighborhoods: effects on marriage timing

Neighbors and neighborhoods: effects on marriage timing

Occupation as an Independent Risk Factor for Binge Drinking

Young Adults in the Workplace: A Multisite Initiative of Substance Use Prevention Programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About