2023
DOI: 10.1063/5.0129007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical tight-binding parameters for wurtzite group III–V(non-nitride) and IV materials

Abstract: Suitable tight-binding models for wurtzite III–V (non-nitride) and group-V materials are presently missing in the literature. Many commonly used nearest neighbor tight-binding models for cubic-zincblende semiconductors result in highly inaccurate band structures when transferred to hexagonal polytypes. Wurtzite parameters would be of use in modeling nanowires that primarily condense into either wurtzite or zincblende crystal phases. Nanowire growth has seen significant development over the last decade, and pol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shift remains within the error margin of the ab initio DFT calculations ( ≈ 0.1 eV or 25% 49 ). Based on the theoretically calculated band offsets and effective masses 19,50,51 , the emission energy versus thickness is also calculated using a conventional finite QW model (dashed line) 52 . This simple model is useful to calculate the emission energies for any QW thickness and composition when reasonable values for the band offsets and carrier masses are available and detailed QP calculations are computationally unfeasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shift remains within the error margin of the ab initio DFT calculations ( ≈ 0.1 eV or 25% 49 ). Based on the theoretically calculated band offsets and effective masses 19,50,51 , the emission energy versus thickness is also calculated using a conventional finite QW model (dashed line) 52 . This simple model is useful to calculate the emission energies for any QW thickness and composition when reasonable values for the band offsets and carrier masses are available and detailed QP calculations are computationally unfeasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ror margin of the ab initio DFT calculations (≈0.1 eV or 25 % [39]). Based on the predicted band offsets and effective masses [17,40,41], the emission energy versus thickness is also calculated using a conventional finite QW model (dashed line) [42] to generalize the prediction to any QW thickness. A qualitative agreement between theory and experiment is obtained, but the experimental emission energies are all higher than the predicted values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%