2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11031-022-09976-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical testing of an alternative modeling of the self-determination continuum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyzed dimensions fit the different types of motivation suggested by the SDT (Ryan andDeci, 2017, 2019;Howard et al, 2020, intrinsic, identified, controlled) in all three specific domains that the instrument assesses (reading, writing and mathematics). Regarding the third objective, correlations between dimensions proved the presence of a continuum as proposed by the theory: highest correlations between contiguous motivations and lower correlations between distant ones (Howard et al, 2020;Bureau et al, 2022). These results corroborate the importance of considering the different types of motivation that are present in early ages for each specific domain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The analyzed dimensions fit the different types of motivation suggested by the SDT (Ryan andDeci, 2017, 2019;Howard et al, 2020, intrinsic, identified, controlled) in all three specific domains that the instrument assesses (reading, writing and mathematics). Regarding the third objective, correlations between dimensions proved the presence of a continuum as proposed by the theory: highest correlations between contiguous motivations and lower correlations between distant ones (Howard et al, 2020;Bureau et al, 2022). These results corroborate the importance of considering the different types of motivation that are present in early ages for each specific domain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Regarding the third objective, correlations between dimensions proved the presence of a continuum as proposed by the theory: highest correlations between contiguous motivations and lower correlations between distant ones (Howard et al, 2020 ; Bureau et al, 2022 ). These results corroborate the importance of considering the different types of motivation that are present in early ages for each specific domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, bifactor modeling was used to simultaneously conceptualize the behavioral regulations as unidimensional (quantity of self-determination) and multidimensional (motivation quality), which is in line with contemporary views of motivation grounded in SDT (e.g., Gunnell & Gaudreau, 2015;Howard, Gagné, & Morin, 2020;Howard et al, 2018;Stenling et al, 2018). Although most previous applications of bifactor models on SDT-based measures of motivation have used a symmetrical bifactor ESEM (i.e., one specific factor per subscale), there are several unresolved issues related to the symmetrical bifactor ESEM (Bureau et al, 2023). The global factor in the symmetrical bifactor ESEM represents what is common among the items, whereas the specific factors represent what is uniquely common to a group of items (Howard et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to SDT, need satisfaction enhances intrinsic motivation and is vital for engagement (Bureau et al, 2023;Ryan & Deci, 2020). Satisfaction of the need for autonomy (i.e., the initiative and ownership of actions) and the need for relatedness (i.e., the belonging and connection to other people) are, however, less under the control of the individual and results primarily through the work and study context (Deci & Ryan, 2000).…”
Section: Intrinsic Motivation As a Mechanism: How Self-efficacy Relat...mentioning
confidence: 99%