1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00531.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Techniques for Determining the Reliability, Magnitude, and Pattern of Neuropsychological Change After Epilepsy Surgery

Abstract: RCIs and regression-based norms are complementary indexes and can be particularly useful in examining the test-retest performance of individual patients who undergo epilepsy surgery as well as in the more general investigation of cognitive outcome after epilepsy surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
154
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
154
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are based on retest reliabilities of data obtained from a group of controls. Additionally the practice effect is considered; that is, an increase of performance due to test repetition (30). With regard to the surgical group, we decided for each patient whether the change score (1 2 months postoperative minus preoperative score) was within or beyond the 90% confidence intervals obtained from the nonsurgical children with epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are based on retest reliabilities of data obtained from a group of controls. Additionally the practice effect is considered; that is, an increase of performance due to test repetition (30). With regard to the surgical group, we decided for each patient whether the change score (1 2 months postoperative minus preoperative score) was within or beyond the 90% confidence intervals obtained from the nonsurgical children with epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes exceeding the RCI are considered reliable and statistically meaningful, but the level at which a change becomes clinically significant has not been determined. For T5, a decline a 1 1 represents the value needed to exceed the RCI 90th centile, 3 7 and 3 5 for the 80th and 70th centiles, respectively (34). A logistic regression analysis, again with backward elimination, was performed to estimate the power of prediction of the independent variables for preto postoperative T5 score decline exceeding RCI at each centile level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For determination of the significance of memory score decline, we used the RCI, an estimate of the degree of variability due to measurement error inherent in the test, and derived from assessment of patients tested twice with no intervening surgery (34). Changes exceeding the RCI are regarded as meaningful and reliable, although the decline that would be considered clinically significant has not been determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These indicated significant improvements in letter cancellation ( t = 4, p = 0.003), response inhibition ( t = 2.5, p = 0.03), and language comprehension ( t = 3.9, p = 0.003). The significance of individual postoperative changes (33,34) was judged based on testretest data in the 65 nonsurgical patients who had done all tests except comprehension, naming, and visuoconstruction. The 90% confidence intervals for the before and after difference scores were calculated by taking into account the retest reliabilities in nonsurgical patients and correcting for retest effects (estimated by the difference in scores for the nonsurgical group) ( Table 7).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%