2016
DOI: 10.1080/0976691x.2016.11884913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Study of Digital Poverty: A Case Study of a University of Technology in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if adolescents have access for short periods, they may not be able to have access to all the sessions or even the full session. Manduna (2016) refers to these experiences as digital poverty that results from broadened socioeconomic and political gaps. Although a large number of middle-to high-income adolescents and their families may have access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if adolescents have access for short periods, they may not be able to have access to all the sessions or even the full session. Manduna (2016) refers to these experiences as digital poverty that results from broadened socioeconomic and political gaps. Although a large number of middle-to high-income adolescents and their families may have access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite different and sometimes contrasting results on the effect of sociodemographic traits on the type and quality of the digital experience, the scientific debate tends to agree on the effect of certain factors. Age, gender [56,57], income [58][59][60], and education [35,61] are widely recognised as predictors of users' access and digital competencies. Moreover, they have also been shown to influence environmental perceptions [62,63] and green choices [64,65].…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%