2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical resilience and vulnerability model of regional group structure considering optimized macroseismic intensity measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various empirical methods have been developed based on resilience concepts or field experiences to evaluate engineering systems. Empirical methods are divided into definite 9,[32][33][34][35][36] and probable [37][38][39][40] sections, each being used for the description of the behavior of static and dynamic systems. In the definite methods, the uncertainties such as the probability of disturbance are not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various empirical methods have been developed based on resilience concepts or field experiences to evaluate engineering systems. Empirical methods are divided into definite 9,[32][33][34][35][36] and probable [37][38][39][40] sections, each being used for the description of the behavior of static and dynamic systems. In the definite methods, the uncertainties such as the probability of disturbance are not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li (7) proposed an optimized macroseismic analysis, integrating the traditional macroseismic intensity scale and evaluation models of resilience and empirical vulnerability of regional buildings. In another work, Li (8) studied the seismic vulnerability of regional group structures, establishing empirical vulnerability matrices of six building groups in different seismic intensity zones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%