2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical relationships between AIRSAR backscatter and LiDAR-derived forest biomass, Queensland, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed correlation with forest biophysical attributes and saturation levels differed significantly across different forest types and environmental imaging conditions, even for a given wavelength. In the case of L-band, the reported saturation levels with respect to aboveground biomass retrieval varied between 40 and 180 t/ha [19,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. A spaceborne P-band SAR, which would be less affected by saturation at higher biomass levels, is planned for launch in the coming years in the frame of the Earth Explorer Program of the European Space Agency (ESA) [32].…”
Section: Spatially Explicit Mapping Of Forest Aboveground Biomass Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed correlation with forest biophysical attributes and saturation levels differed significantly across different forest types and environmental imaging conditions, even for a given wavelength. In the case of L-band, the reported saturation levels with respect to aboveground biomass retrieval varied between 40 and 180 t/ha [19,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. A spaceborne P-band SAR, which would be less affected by saturation at higher biomass levels, is planned for launch in the coming years in the frame of the Earth Explorer Program of the European Space Agency (ESA) [32].…”
Section: Spatially Explicit Mapping Of Forest Aboveground Biomass Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have estimated LAI and biomass based on SAR images data acquired from either airborne or space-borne platforms [27][28][29][30][31]. Some studies have shown that SAR backscattering was well correlated with biomass, especially that characterized by medium fractional cover [32][33][34]. Since optical and SAR image data respond to crop characteristics differently, their complementary information content can support the estimation of crop conditions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common parameter modelled is above ground biomass (AGB). In a similar manner to visible-near infrared reflectance-based indices, the SAR backscatter-AGB relationship is curvilinear and many studies have found that it typically saturates in the range of 100-150 t/ha (from the reviews of [165,167,169]), whereas others have found lower thresholds of saturation [170,171]. Thus, biomass and biomass loss are difficult to model and estimate using backscatter or backscatter-based indices in dense forests.…”
Section: Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%