2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical relationship between interfacial shear stress and contact pressure in micro- and macro-scale friction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relationship has recently been proven to be valid within reasonable experimental error for both macroscopic and microscopic contacts (Figure 2). [29] In this recent study, it was shown that, if the surface roughness is smaller than the Hertzian deformation depth and surface roughening due to wear is negligible, the Hertzian contact area can be used for this calculation; if not, the effective contact area should be calculated from the surface roughness of the sliding track or measured independently during sliding. [29] Figure 2.…”
Section: A Experimental Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This relationship has recently been proven to be valid within reasonable experimental error for both macroscopic and microscopic contacts (Figure 2). [29] In this recent study, it was shown that, if the surface roughness is smaller than the Hertzian deformation depth and surface roughening due to wear is negligible, the Hertzian contact area can be used for this calculation; if not, the effective contact area should be calculated from the surface roughness of the sliding track or measured independently during sliding. [29] Figure 2.…”
Section: A Experimental Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] In this recent study, it was shown that, if the surface roughness is smaller than the Hertzian deformation depth and surface roughening due to wear is negligible, the Hertzian contact area can be used for this calculation; if not, the effective contact area should be calculated from the surface roughness of the sliding track or measured independently during sliding. [29] Figure 2. Empirical relationship between the interfacial shear stress (τ) due to kinetic friction and the average normal contact stress (σ) for (a) macroscopic sliding of a 3 mm dia.…”
Section: A Experimental Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the Hertzian contact mechanics, the average contact pressure was calculated to be 303 MPa. , The lateral force exerted to the sphere due to friction during the bidirectional motion of the substrate was measured with a strain gauge sensor which was calibrated in the expected friction force range. The coefficient of friction (COF) was calculated by using Amonton’s law (friction coefficient = friction force/normal load) . A dry nitrogen stream (H 2 O < 3 ppm, O 2 < 4 ppm based on the supplier’s specification) was mixed with another stream saturated with water vapor at room temperature to produce the friction test in a relative humidity (RH) of 50%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of friction (COF) was calculated by using Amonton's law (friction coefficient = friction force/normal load). 58 A dry nitrogen stream (H 2 O < 3 ppm, O 2 < 4 ppm based on the supplier's specification) was mixed with another stream saturated with water vapor at room temperature 59 to produce the friction test in a relative humidity (RH) of 50%. The humid nitrogen was continuously flowed over the sample at a flow rate of 2 L/min to maintain the constant humidity during the measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%