2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aacdae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Relations for the Accurate Estimation of Stellar Masses and Radii

Abstract: In this work, we have taken advantage of the most recent accurate stellar characterizations carried out using asteroseismology, eclipsing binaries and interferometry to evaluate a comprehensive set of empirical relations for the estimation of stellar masses and radii. We have gathered a total of 934 stars-of which around two-thirds are on the main sequence-that are characterized with different levels of precision, most of them having estimates of M, R, T eff , L, g, ρ, and [Fe/H]. We have deliberately used a h… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PDMF weighting strongly decreases with increasing mass following a multi-component power law (Kroupa 2002). A mean effective temperature (T eff ) is associated to each spectral type, and the corresponding main sequence mass is then computed from the mass -T eff relation of Moya et al (2018):…”
Section: The Pdmf-corrected Sb1 Fraction and Its Metallicity Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PDMF weighting strongly decreases with increasing mass following a multi-component power law (Kroupa 2002). A mean effective temperature (T eff ) is associated to each spectral type, and the corresponding main sequence mass is then computed from the mass -T eff relation of Moya et al (2018):…”
Section: The Pdmf-corrected Sb1 Fraction and Its Metallicity Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This empirical relation is accurate to better than 10% and is based on 125 stars among which 41% are eclipsing binaries, whereas 57% and 2% of the masses are derived from asteroseismic and interferometric observations, respectively. Moya et al (2018) investigated numerous other functional relations (e.g. stellar mass as a function of T eff and surface gravity) and, among those, some have better regression coefficients than the one we selected, which is nevertheless largely sufficient for our purpose.…”
Section: The Pdmf-corrected Sb1 Fraction and Its Metallicity Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus extensively used as a reference object for empirical mass and radius calibrations (e.g. Torres et al 2010;Eker et al 2015;Moya et al 2018). A number of theoretical studies attempted to explain the inflated radii of the components of YY Gem by developing different versions of non-conventional stellar interior structure models which incorporated effects of magnetic field and surface inhomogeneities (Feiden & Chaboyer 2013;MacDonald & Mullan 2014, 2017aJackson & Jeffries 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact may arise from the different choices adopted for the calibration of stellar masses in the two catalogues. In our case, we adopted the calibration from Moya et al (2018) which accounts both for the temperature and absolute luminosity of the stars, while Stassun et al (2018) and Stassun et al (2019) adopt a calibration based only on the temperatures. The differences between the asPIC1.1 and TICv8 estimated parameters are shown in the histograms in Fig.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%