2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical models to predict the volumes of debris flows generated by recently burned basins in the western U.S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
122
3
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
122
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The model of Gartner et al (2008) was applied to estimate the volume of material mobilised from basins affected by fire-related debris flows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model of Gartner et al (2008) was applied to estimate the volume of material mobilised from basins affected by fire-related debris flows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared these results with estimates obtained using the stepwise regression model of Gartner et al (2008) where V is the volume of a debris flow (m 3 ), S is the basin area with a gradient equal or greater than 30% (2.36 km 2 ), B is the total area of the burned basin (2.36 km 2 ), and R is the total rainfall during the rainstorm (25 mm).…”
Section: Volume Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gartner (2005) and Gartner et al (2008) examined 56 basins in eight burned areas in California, Utah and Colorado to develop six models based on stepwise multiple regressions. These regressions indicated that debris flow volume in burned areas is most dependent on burn severity, slope angle, and total storm rainfall.…”
Section: Existing Volume Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models have been developed to predict debris-flow volumes by utilizing a number of different parameters related to rainfall, basin geomorphology and material properties (e.g., Gartner, 2005;Bovis and Jakob, 1999;Cannon et al, 2010;Gartner et al, 2008;Hungr et al, 1984). To this point, these models have provided their user with a single value expected to represent the volume of the debris flow most likely predicted by their input variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%