2018 International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icirca.2018.8597290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Methodology of Testing Using FMEA and Quality Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas non-functional testing evaluates how the system performs, such as performance, usability, or security, functional testing determines whether the product satisfies its specification based on software requirements [9]. If flaws are discovered, testers reduce the risk by making people aware of them and offering fixes before a product is released [10]. To inform stakeholders about the quality of the product or service being tested, an investigation known as software testing is carried out.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas non-functional testing evaluates how the system performs, such as performance, usability, or security, functional testing determines whether the product satisfies its specification based on software requirements [9]. If flaws are discovered, testers reduce the risk by making people aware of them and offering fixes before a product is released [10]. To inform stakeholders about the quality of the product or service being tested, an investigation known as software testing is carried out.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time window established and presented in Figure 1, since year 2000 onwards, there is an increasing interest in RBT, with research increasing from 2012 to the present. The percentage of studies according to the classification type per year is: (i) 22.7% corresponding to approaches: 2012 (30) , 2017 (14) , 2018 (22) , 2020 (32,33) ; (ii) 18.2% corresponds to case study: 2000 (21) , 2010 (29) , 2014 (2) , 2016 (12) ; (iii) 9.1% corresponds to Taxonomy: 2014 (9) , 2019 (4) ; (iv) 9.1% corresponds to Techniques: 2005 (26) , 2018 (28) . (v) 40.9% corresponds to one article per year in Framework 2014 (27) , Tools 2007 (31) , Method 2016 (8) , Methodology 2013 (25) , Model 2012 (13) , Prediction of Defects 2016 (23) , Procedure 2014 (7) , Process 2010 (10) and Exploratory Review 2016 (24) .…”
Section: What Studies On Risk-based Testing Exist?mentioning
confidence: 99%