Empirical Method for Estimating Aircraft Fuel Consumption in Ground Operations

Abstract

This study proposes a novel procedure for estimating aircraft fuel burn during ground operations using aircraft trajectory data acquired from an airport surface surveillance system. A fundamental assumption employed throughout the study is that aircraft fuel burn on the ground depends on taxi phases and corresponding thrust settings. The computational process is split into three steps: (1) define a taxi phase for each data point by analyzing the trajectory data; (2) find the fuel flow index appropriate for each taxi phase of each engine type from the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Engine Emissions Databank which contains fuel flow indices for four flight status of every commercial engine; and (3) estimate the total fuel burn on the ground for each flight by multiplying the time duration at each taxi phase by the corresponding fuel flow rate. Using 24-hour surface trajectory data collected from the Airport Surface Detection Equipment (ASDE) system at Seoul/Incheon International Airport, all flights operated on the day were analyzed applying this procedure. The results indicate that suggested taxi fuel burn rates are estimated to be about 17% lower than the ICAO values. The proposed procedure is expected to be used as an alternative method for ground fuel burn estimation.

More Electric Aircraft Conversion to All-Electric During Ground Operations: Battery-Powered Landing Gear Drive System

“…The ongoing electrification aligns well with the postulate of the Flightpath 2050 which requires the emission-free taxi movement by 2050 [2]. To meet this target, the widely used internal combustion engines (ICE) must be replaced including the auxiliary power unit (APU) which burns approximately 2 kg/min [4] of jet fuel and the main engines that burn 7.7 kg/min per engine [5] during ground movement of shorthaul aircraft. Both ground and onboard systems have been proposed for replacing the ICE of aircraft, of which the most impactful are summarized below.…”

Radical technology innovations for high‐speed transport; ePlanes to replace rail?

“…Conventional aircraft require fuel for all parts of the flight envelope plus sufficient reserves in cases of emergency [36]. Aircraft flying into larger airports require more reserves in case of congestion [37,38]. Electric aircraft also need reserves of energy.…”

A critical review of energy consumption and optimization strategies in the Nigerian aviation sector: challenges and prospects

“…An efficient air traffic control system can reduce unnecessary airtime, leading to energy savings (Han 2023;Kwasiborska and Skorupski 2021;Wen et al 2022). Similarly, efficient Orikpete et al Bulletin of the National Research Centre (2023) 47:170 ground operations, ensuring rapid turnarounds and minimizing taxiing times, can also chip away at the overall energy bill (Jeon et al 2022;Kim and Baik 2020;Zhang et al 2019b).…”