1997
DOI: 10.1118/1.597918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high‐resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat‐panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation

Abstract: Signal properties of the first large-area, high resolution, active matrix, flat-panel imager are reported. The imager is based on an array of 1536 x 1920 pixels with a pixel-to-pixel pitch of 127 microns. Each pixel consists of a discrete amorphous silicon n-i-p photodiode coupled to an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor. The imager detects incident x rays indirectly by means of an intensifying screen placed over the array. External acquisition electronics send control signals to the array and process anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(63 reference statements)
4
128
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35 In order to control the amount of light received by array pixels, the LED was placed a short distance above each array and was flashed a specific number of times between frames, with each flash lasting a few microseconds. 34 For measurements with the incandescent lamp, there was no synchronization between light emission and array readout. In this case, the light source was continuously "on" and the desired amount of light signal per image frame was achieved through a combination of appropriate optical collimation and positioning of the light source above an array.…”
Section: Iid Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 In order to control the amount of light received by array pixels, the LED was placed a short distance above each array and was flashed a specific number of times between frames, with each flash lasting a few microseconds. 34 For measurements with the incandescent lamp, there was no synchronization between light emission and array readout. In this case, the light source was continuously "on" and the desired amount of light signal per image frame was achieved through a combination of appropriate optical collimation and positioning of the light source above an array.…”
Section: Iid Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data frames were acquired either in the absence of radiation ͑resulting in dark frames͒ or in the presence of radiation using X rays or optical illumination ͑resulting in image frames͒. Image frames were acquired both radiographically and fluoroscopically 34 with the delivery of radiation synchronized with array readout.…”
Section: Iic Electronic Acquisition Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correction for lag ͑i.e., frame-to-frame signal carryover, estimated to be ϳ3%͒ was applied to each NPS, yielding a lag-corrected NPS, NPS L . 5,36,37,44 In this article, the normalized NPS ͑NNPS͒ was determined from…”
Section: Iib Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal and noise data, including sensitivity, lag, and NPS, were acquired in fluoroscopic mode, while MTF data were acquired in radiographic mode. 13,50,51 In fluoroscopic mode, a sequence of image frames was acquired in synchronization with beam pulses ͑using the "Target I" signal provided by the linac͒, so that every image frame was read out after delivery of a predetermined number of pulses. Dark frames were acquired in synchronization with pulses generated by a pulse generator ͑33250A, Agilent Technologies, Inc., USA͒ operated at the same frequency as the beam pulses.…”
Section: Iib Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%