2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88873-4_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Insights on a Value of Ontology Quality in Ontology-Driven Web Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this framework, different knowledge bases can be compared indirectly, bearing in mind that knowledge bases can obtain varying performances on different tasks. Strasunskas and Tomassen have proposed a scheme to evaluate the 'ontology fitness' with respect to search tasks [101].…”
Section: The Quality Of Crowdsourced Geo-knowledge Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this framework, different knowledge bases can be compared indirectly, bearing in mind that knowledge bases can obtain varying performances on different tasks. Strasunskas and Tomassen have proposed a scheme to evaluate the 'ontology fitness' with respect to search tasks [101].…”
Section: The Quality Of Crowdsourced Geo-knowledge Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several ontology quality metrics have been devised. Stransunkas and Tomassen, while presenting a framework for ontology evaluation for information retrieval, survey existing ontology metrics [101]. Beside formal quality metrics based on structure, coherence, and other aspects, an open geo-ontology can be evaluated indirectly on the basis of results obtained in real-world tasks.…”
Section: Current Limitations Of Geo-knowledge Bases and Girmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-level evaluation framework looking at concept tagging was used to evaluate how well an ontology performs (Porzel and Malaka, 2005). Precision and recall were used in an evaluation framework to evaluate an ontology in the Web search task (Strasunskas and Tomassen, 2008). Nevertheless, none of the evaluation approaches above test or incorporate the connection between ontology characteristics and context parameters that can provide an actionable guideline for ontology engineers.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these information need distinctions, Strasunskas and Tomassen [15] propose a set of evaluation measures for a search ontology:…”
Section: Search Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%