Empirical Industrial Organization: A Progress Report

Abstract

T T he fi eld of industrial organization has made dramatic advances over the he fi eld of industrial organization has made dramatic advances over the last few decades in developing empirical methods for analyzing imperfect last few decades in developing empirical methods for analyzing imperfect competition and the organization of markets. These new methods have competition and the organization of markets. These new methods have diffused widely: into merger reviews and antitrust litigation, regulatory decision diffused widely: into merger reviews and antitrust litigation, regulatory decision making, price setting by retailers, the design of auctions and marketplaces, and making, price setting by retailers, the design of auctions and marketplaces, and into neighboring fi elds in economics, marketing, and engineering. Increasing into neighboring fi elds in economics, marketing, and engineering. Increasing access to fi rm-level data and in some cases the ability to cooperate with fi rms or access to fi rm-level data and in some cases the ability to cooperate with fi rms or governments in experimental research designs is offering new settings and opporgovernments in experimental research designs is offering new settings and opportunities to apply these ideas in empirical work. tunities to apply these ideas in empirical work.This essay begins with a sketch of how the fi eld has evolved to its current state, This essay begins with a sketch of how the fi eld has evolved to its current state, in particular how the fi eld's emphasis has shifted over time from attempts to relate in particular how the fi eld's emphasis has shifted over time from attempts to relate aggregate measures across industries toward more focused studies of individual aggregate measures across industries toward more focused studies of individual industries. The second and primary part of the essay describes several active areas industries. The second and primary part of the essay describes several active areas of inquiry. While this is in some sense a survey, our goal is not to be comprehenof inquiry. While this is in some sense a survey, our goal is not to be comprehensive but to highlight key ideas and illustrate how modern research has approached sive but to highlight key ideas and illustrate how modern research has approached different problems. We also discuss some of the impacts of this research and specify different problems. We also discuss some of the impacts of this research and specify topics where research efforts have been more or less successful. The last section topics where research efforts have been more or less successful. The last section steps back to offer a broader perspective. We address some current debates about steps back to offer a broader perspective. We address some current debates about research emphasis in the fi eld, and more broadly about empirical methods, and research emphasis in the fi eld, and more broadly about empirical methods, and offer some thoughts on where future research might go. offer some thoughts on wh...

Doctor Competence and the Demand for Healthcare: Evidence from Rural China

“…There are multiple channels through which patients can infer quality, the most obvious being through repeated exposure to health services (Corno, ). However, as emphasised by the literature on empirical industrial organisation (see seminal work by Perloff and Salop, , Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes, as well as the survey article by Einav and Levin, ), the accuracy of consumers' inferences, and those of patients in particular, are likely to be variable and ridded by unobserved heterogeneity. As a result, how the demand for healthcare is affected by quality remains an empirical question.…”

Mortgage Brokers, Origination Fees, Price Transparency and Competition

“…See Einav and Levin () and Weiss () for comprehensive reviews of the economics literature. For surveys on bank concentration, see Berger et al .…”

Building Bridges between Structural and Program Evaluation Approaches to Evaluating Policy

“…24, No. 2, Spring 2010 (Angrist and Pischke, 2010; Einav and Levin, 2010; Keane, 2010; Leamer, 2010; Nevo and Whinston, 2010; Sims, 2010; Stock, 2010). …”