2005
DOI: 10.1785/0120030231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Ground-Motion Attenuation Relations for the Eastern Alps in the Magnitude Range 2.5-6.3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That by Bragato and Slejko (2005) is one of them and, as already mentioned, is consistent with the preliminary results presented by Bommer et al (2007). Additionally, it satisfies 8 out of the 10 criteria proposed by Bommer et al (2010), the remaining two being of lesser importance since the model will be employed in only part of the magnitude range.…”
Section: Attenuation Modelsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That by Bragato and Slejko (2005) is one of them and, as already mentioned, is consistent with the preliminary results presented by Bommer et al (2007). Additionally, it satisfies 8 out of the 10 criteria proposed by Bommer et al (2010), the remaining two being of lesser importance since the model will be employed in only part of the magnitude range.…”
Section: Attenuation Modelsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Since one of the objectives of the work was to capture this spectral amplification, the sampling provided by Ambraseys et al (2005), smaller than other attenuation models and consistent with that of Bragato and Slejko (2005), was considered more appropriate. Additionally it is consistent with the model by Bragato and Slejko (2005), with which it will be combined. In relation to the magnitude, it is not important that the model by Ambraseys et al (2005) does not include the non-linear magnitude dependence proposed by Bommer et al (2010), because it will only be used in part of the magnitude range.…”
Section: Attenuation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that all rejected GMMs overestimate the spectral values could be explained by the fact that the tested GMMs all were derived using mainly records from earthquakes with larger magnitudes than the earthquakes used in this study and ground motions from small earthquakes decay more rapidly than those from large earthquakes (e.g. Ambraseys et al, 2005;Bragato & Slejko, 2005;Pousse et al, 2006). The ranking list presented by Scherbaum et al (2004) shows a high degree of consistency with the results from the present study (see Table 3).…”
Section: Ranking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The background noise is a limiting factor since it can mask seismic signal, especially in the low-frequency band. The importance of noise level reduction on seismic data is strongly linked to quantify the detection level of the network, that reflects directly on the completeness magnitude of an area and indirectly on the calibration of attenuation relations through regression analysis, which may be biased by non-triggering stations (McLaughlin, 1991;Bragato and Slejko, 2005).…”
Section: First Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%