2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2844022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Geometrical Bounds on MIMO Antenna Arrays for Optimum Diversity Gain Performance: An Electromagnetic Design Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, Table 4 compares the introduced antenna design's performance with other published works [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. As can be seen, this work meets the objective of steering the main beam in any direction in the horizontal plane.…”
Section: S 11 and Radiation Pattern Of Array With Rf Beamformermentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, Table 4 compares the introduced antenna design's performance with other published works [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. As can be seen, this work meets the objective of steering the main beam in any direction in the horizontal plane.…”
Section: S 11 and Radiation Pattern Of Array With Rf Beamformermentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, this research investigates antenna array configurations rather than focusing on the performance of analog beamforming or antenna design. Many researchers investigate analog beamforming algorithms in terms of array performance [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. To date, there has been a lack of discussion in terms of the hardware implementation of the effectiveness of the proposed methods by the measurement results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expenditures boost even further in the case of global optimization procedures. In fact, performing EM-driven antenna optimization with the use of the most popular population-based metaheuristics (particle swarm [20]- [25] or genetic algorithms [26], [27]) is usually very costly. As a consequence, an extensive research effort has been directed toward expediting the optimization procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. route), the concept of cross-correlation Green's functions (CGFs) was first introduced in [16], [17] and later elaborated for antenna design applications [30], [18]. A preliminary step of this CGF-based correlation calculation is to construct a suitable infinitesimal dipole model (IDM) for the radiating MIMO antenna current distribution (see [19]- [28] for detailed theory and applications of IDM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, this antenna spatial correlation performance is determined from a formula involving the radiation patterns of individual elements [10], which makes it very cumbersome to perform antenna current level optimization aiming at a desired diversity performance. To relate the antenna correlation directly to the radiating antenna current distribution (i.e., essentially bypassing altogether the original far-field pattern route), the concept of cross-correlation Green's functions (CGFs) was first introduced in [16], [17] and later elaborated for antenna design applications [30], [18]. A preliminary step of this CGF-based correlation calculation is to construct a suitable infinitesimal dipole model (IDM) for the radiating MIMO antenna current distribution (see [19]- [28] for detailed theory and applications of IDM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%