2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2005.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical evidence on the evolution of liquidity: Choice of market versus limit orders by informed and uninformed traders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
106
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
14
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, uninformed investors are less aggressive early in the trading day and become more aggressive as the trading day comes to a close. Beber and Caglio (2005) offer empirical evidence supporting the prediction of Harris (1998) while Anand et al (2005) and Ellul et al (2007) document evidence consistent with the experimental finding of Bloomfield et al (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, uninformed investors are less aggressive early in the trading day and become more aggressive as the trading day comes to a close. Beber and Caglio (2005) offer empirical evidence supporting the prediction of Harris (1998) while Anand et al (2005) and Ellul et al (2007) document evidence consistent with the experimental finding of Bloomfield et al (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Besides spread, market depth and volatility, we include a dummy variable for the first trading hour to examine the potential differences in the order aggressiveness of institutional and individual investors in the early part of the trading day, as suggested by Bloomfield et al (2005) and Anand et al (2005). The dummy variable for sell orders is included to control for potential asymmetry between buy and sell orders, as documented by Ranaldo (2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers show that voluntary disclosure reduces information asymmetry, which consequently reduces the cost of capital (Diamond and Verrecchia, 1991;Coller and Yohn, 1997) and facilitates externally financed firm growth (Khurana, Pereira, and Martin, 2006) and that voluntary disclosure of firm specific information allows better monitoring by investors and ensures that managers undertake optimal investments (Fama and Jensen, 1983;Diamond and Verrecchia, 1991;Bushman and Smith, 2001;Khurana et al, 2006). Consistent with this 8 Chakravarty and Holden (1995), Bae, Jang, and Park (2003), Anand, Chakravarty, and Martell (2005), and Ellul, Jain, Holden, and Jennings (2007) also study the choice between market and limit orders submissions.…”
Section: Literature Review and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…They are likely to use market orders (or marketable limit orders) reducing the level of market liquidity. 27 [39] and [44] extend the work of [41] to show that informed traders may become liquidity suppliers once their information advantage has been depleted (toward the end of the trading period). The dual role of informed traders as demanders and suppliers of liquidity is a common theme across these two studies.…”
Section:  Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%