2014
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical evidence for musical syntax processing? Computer simulations reveal the contribution of auditory short-term memory

Abstract: During the last decade, it has been argued that (1) music processing involves syntactic representations similar to those observed in language, and (2) that music and language share similar syntactic-like processes and neural resources. This claim is important for understanding the origin of music and language abilities and, furthermore, it has clinical implications. The Western musical system, however, is rooted in psychoacoustic properties of sound, and this is not the case for linguistic syntax. Accordingly,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
88
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple levels of perceptual and cognitive processing shape tonal expectations during music listening (Bigand, Delbe, Poulin-Charronnat, Leman, & Tillmann, 2014;Collins et al, 2014), as has been shown using computational models of the perceptual representation-cognitive schema continuum (Collins et al, 2014;Toiviainen & Krumhansl, 2003). Models of tonal space (which more closely reflect musical cognitive processes rather than sensory processes) have been shown to drive melodic and harmonic expectations for strongly primed musical events, and have been shown to explain variance in response times to strongly primed musical events above and beyond the variance explained by models of acoustic features of music (which more closely reflect sensory rather than cognitive mechanisms of music perception; Collins et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Tonal Space Model Of Dynamic Musical Structurementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple levels of perceptual and cognitive processing shape tonal expectations during music listening (Bigand, Delbe, Poulin-Charronnat, Leman, & Tillmann, 2014;Collins et al, 2014), as has been shown using computational models of the perceptual representation-cognitive schema continuum (Collins et al, 2014;Toiviainen & Krumhansl, 2003). Models of tonal space (which more closely reflect musical cognitive processes rather than sensory processes) have been shown to drive melodic and harmonic expectations for strongly primed musical events, and have been shown to explain variance in response times to strongly primed musical events above and beyond the variance explained by models of acoustic features of music (which more closely reflect sensory rather than cognitive mechanisms of music perception; Collins et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Tonal Space Model Of Dynamic Musical Structurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…We focus on tonality, and the concept of tonal space because the importance of this cognitive schema to the perception and appreciation of music has been well established across Tonal space comprises the system of major and minor keys in Western tonal music in which the melodies and chord (harmony) changes in pieces of music create time-varying trajectories (Collins, Tillmann, Barrett, Delbe, & Janata, 2014;Janata, 2003;Janata et al, 2007;Krumhansl, 1990; Toiviainen & Krumhansl, 2003). Multiple levels of perceptual and cognitive processing shape tonal expectations during music listening (Bigand, Delbe, Poulin-Charronnat, Leman, & Tillmann, 2014; Collins et al, 2014), as has been shown using computational models of the perceptual representation-cognitive schema continuum (Collins et al, 2014; Toiviainen & Krumhansl, 2003). Models of tonal space (which more closely reflect musical cognitive processes rather than sensory processes) have been shown to drive melodic and harmonic expectations for strongly primed musical events, and have been shown to explain variance in response times to strongly primed musical events above and beyond the variance explained by models of acoustic features of music (which more closely reflect sensory rather than cognitive mechanisms of music perception; Collins et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Experiment 5 1 focused on the processing of musical syntax whereas Experiment 2 examined the perception of tonality. We also evaluated the extent to which pitch discrimination impairments in amusia are predictive of musical syntax and tonality processing, given recent discussions of the complex relationship between the processing of tonal music structure and physical properties of sound (Bigand, Delbé, Poulin-Charronnat, Leman, & Tillmann, 2014;Collins, Tillmann, Delbé, Barrett, & Janata, 2014). If the processing of musical structure is based on the extraction of acoustic features (Huron & Parncutt, 1993;Leman, 2000;Parncutt & Bregman, 2000), then low-level pitch processing deficits in amusia should predict difficulties in processing syntax and tonality.…”
Section: --------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to language, tonal music is “syntactic” in the sense that perceptually discrete elements (such as tones or chords) are combined into musical sequences bound by hierarchical relationships (Bigand, Delbé, Poulin‐Charronnat, Leman, & Tillmann, ). Typically, musical hierarchy can be represented by the perceived stabilities of musical events (Krumhansl, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%