2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02085-8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Evaluation of Wireless Underground-to-Underground Communication in Wireless Underground Sensor Networks

Abstract: Abstract. Many applications for irrigation management and environment monitoring exploit buried sensors wired-connected to the soil surface for information retrieval. Wireless Underground Sensor Networks (WUSNs) is an emerging area of research that promises to provide communication capabilities to these sensors. To accomplish this, a reliable wireless underground communication channel is necessary, allowing the direct communication between the buried sensors without the help of an aboveground device. However, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a natural extension to the well-established wireless sensor network (WSN) paradigm [1], WUSNs are envisioned to provide underground monitoring capabilities in the fields of intelligent irrigation, environment monitoring, border patrol, and assisted navigation. Despite their potential advantages, however, the realization of WUSNs is challenging due to the significant and direct impact of soil characteristics and its dynamics on communication [3], [10]. More specifically, the changes in temperature, weather, soil moisture, soil composition, and depth directly impact the connectivity and communication success in underground settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a natural extension to the well-established wireless sensor network (WSN) paradigm [1], WUSNs are envisioned to provide underground monitoring capabilities in the fields of intelligent irrigation, environment monitoring, border patrol, and assisted navigation. Despite their potential advantages, however, the realization of WUSNs is challenging due to the significant and direct impact of soil characteristics and its dynamics on communication [3], [10]. More specifically, the changes in temperature, weather, soil moisture, soil composition, and depth directly impact the connectivity and communication success in underground settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where d is the distance between the transmitter and receiver and α and β are given by Equations (4) and (5).…”
Section: Propagation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 2.4 GHz is a common frequency band used in terrestrial wireless sensor networks, it is not suitable for environments where attenuation is high (due to higher losses). Previous studies on underground transmission using 2.4 GHz showed that due to the high attenuation of soil this frequency band is not feasible [5]. In these environments (i.e., soil) lower frequency bandwidths are preferred due to their lower losses and therefore longer potential range.…”
Section: Trial Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations