Empirical evaluation of ductility factors for the special steel moment‐resisting frames in view of soil condition

Abstract

It is well known that the response modification factor (R) takes into account the ductility, over‐strength, redundancy and damping of structural systems. The ductility factor has played an important role in seismic design, as it is a key component of R. In this study, the ductility factors (Rμ,MDOF) of special steel moment‐resisting frames are calculated by multiplying the ductility factor of single degree of freedom (SDOF) systems (Rμ,SDOF) with the multi‐degree of freedom (MDOF) modification factors (RM). The ductility factors (Rμ,SDOF) of SDOF systems are computed from non‐linear dynamic analysis undergoing different levels of displacement ductility demands and periods when subjected to a large number of recorded earthquake ground motions. To compute the Rμ,SDOF, a group of 1,860 ground motions recorded from 47 earthquakes were considered. RM factors are proposed to account for the MDOF systems, based on previous studies. A total of 108 prototype steel frames were designed to investigate the ductility factors, considering design parameters such as the number of stories (4, 8 and 16), framing systems (perimeter frames and distributed frames), failure mechanisms (strong column‐weak beam and weak column‐strong beam), soil profiles (SA, SC and SE in Uniform Building Code 1997) and seismic zone factors (Z = 0·075, 0·2, and 0·4 in UBC 1997). The effects of these design parameters on the Rμ,MDOF of special steel‐moment‐resisting frames were investigated. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

New approach to evaluate the response modification factors for steel moment resisting frames

“…A simplified expression is desired to consider the ductility factor (R µ )-displacement ductility ratio (µ)-period (T) relationship for each site condition. The approximate ductility factor for SDOF systems (R µ,SDOF ) was suggested by (4) where φ is a function of the displacement ductility ratio (µ), the period (T), and the site conditions (Kang and Choi, 2010). For each site condition, the functions φ that fit best mean ductility factors were given by Appendix.…”

“…Empirical expressions to evaluate the ductility factor (R µ ) for SDOF systems and MDOF modification factors (R M ) were previously developed by the authors (Kang and Choi, 2010). Based on this precedent studies, simplified expressions and procedures to evaluate the response modification factors (R) for steel moment resisting frames are suggested in this study.…”

Evaluation of the effect of shear wall with and without opening on the ductility of RC structure

“…Hashemi et al (2018) in their paper gave a full analysis of the ductility factor for bubble deck system with different parameters including the number of storeys and span length. Kang et al (2009) in their paper made a wide study about ductility factor with a lot of parameters including soil profiles, failure mechanisms, seismic zones, number of storeys. Sarhan and Raslan (2020) stated that the ductility of the structure is directly related to the occurrence of plastic hinges in the structure.…”