2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.560341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Determinants of Corruption: A Sensitivity Analysis

Abstract: Many variables have been proposed by past studies as significant determinants of corruption. This paper asks if their estimated impact on corruption is robust to alteration of the information set. A "Global Sensitivity Analysis", based on the Leamer's Extreme-Bounds Analysis gives a clear answer: five variables are robustly related to corruption. Corruption is lower in richer countries, where democratic institutions have been preserved for a long continuous period, and the population is mainly Protestant. Corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
201
3
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(13 reference statements)
19
201
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the endogeneity issue, we employ the IV estimation, in which the choice of appropriate instruments is important; instruments must be highly correlated with (1999) show that legal origin has a significant effect on corruption. Likely, using the extreme-bounds analysis, Serra (2006) comprehensively examines the determinants of corruption and points out that British legal origin is a crucial determinant of corruption. Given these findings, legal origin highly influences current level of corruption, but may not affect current economic growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the endogeneity issue, we employ the IV estimation, in which the choice of appropriate instruments is important; instruments must be highly correlated with (1999) show that legal origin has a significant effect on corruption. Likely, using the extreme-bounds analysis, Serra (2006) comprehensively examines the determinants of corruption and points out that British legal origin is a crucial determinant of corruption. Given these findings, legal origin highly influences current level of corruption, but may not affect current economic growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years its use has expanded to other fields where there is no clear consensus about which variables belong in a "true" model. Recent examples of topics subjected to the EBA procedure include the determinants of corruption (Serra 2006), life satisfaction (Bjørnskov et al 2008) and R&D investment (Wang 2010).…”
Section: Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variable is arguably the most important control variable, as citizens living in countries with higher income levels have strong preferences for better governance (Treisman 2000, Serra 2006). At the same time, richer countries have the financial resources to improve government regulations or to fight corruption.…”
Section: Data and Estimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These contradictory results could be explained by the period Leite and Weidmann use. They employ data for the 1970s and 1980s to compare the results of their subsequent growth regressions with those reported by Sachs and Warner (1995), basically excluding the 1990s for which Ades and Di Tella (1999), Treisman (2000) and Serra (2006) could not verify the negative link between natural resource exports and corruption. 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%