2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical cross sensor comparison of Sentinel-2A and 2B MSI, Landsat-8 OLI, and Landsat-7 ETM+ top of atmosphere spectral characteristics over the conterminous United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
120
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
120
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although efforts have been made in the radiometric and geometric calibration of the Landsat and S2 missions so that their bands could be compatible [20], small spectral differences still exist [11,20,33]. We adjusted the six Landsat bands (blue, green, red, nir, swir1, and swir2) using cross-sensor transformation coefficients (Table 1) derived from Chastain et al, (2019) [33]. Chastain et al, (2019) [33] used absolute difference metrics and major axis linear regression analysis over 10,000 image pairs across the conterminous United States to obtain these transformation coefficients.…”
Section: Band Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although efforts have been made in the radiometric and geometric calibration of the Landsat and S2 missions so that their bands could be compatible [20], small spectral differences still exist [11,20,33]. We adjusted the six Landsat bands (blue, green, red, nir, swir1, and swir2) using cross-sensor transformation coefficients (Table 1) derived from Chastain et al, (2019) [33]. Chastain et al, (2019) [33] used absolute difference metrics and major axis linear regression analysis over 10,000 image pairs across the conterminous United States to obtain these transformation coefficients.…”
Section: Band Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adjusted the six Landsat bands (blue, green, red, nir, swir1, and swir2) using cross-sensor transformation coefficients (Table 1) derived from Chastain et al, (2019) [33]. Chastain et al, (2019) [33] used absolute difference metrics and major axis linear regression analysis over 10,000 image pairs across the conterminous United States to obtain these transformation coefficients.…”
Section: Band Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional image pre-processing steps were applied to account for sensor, solar, atmospheric, and topographic distortions (Young et al, 2017) and create a reliable and consistent time series. We applied shadow and cloud removal (Housman et al, 2018;Chastain et al, 2019), a bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) (Lucht et al, 2000;Roy et al, 2008Roy et al, , 2016bRoy et al, , 2017Gao et al, 2014) and topographic correction (Smith et al, 1980;Justice et al, 1981;Teillet et al, 1982;Soenen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Annual Satellite Image Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wide coverage, rapid updating, and spatiotemporal synchronization are some of the most important features of remotely sensed images [1]. In addition, the policy on providing free access to high-resolution satellite data archives (mainly Landsat and Copernicus) coupled with computational capabilities of platforms, such as Google Earth Engine (GEE) [2], open up new frontiers in change detection approaches [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%