2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical color transformations between SDSS photometry and other photometric systems

Abstract: Aims. We present empirical color transformations between the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) ugriz photometry and the JohnsonCousins UBVRI system and Becker's RGU system, respectively. Owing to the magnitude of data that is becoming available in the SDSS photometric system it is particularly important to be able to convert between this new system and traditional photometric systems. Unlike earlier published transformations we based our calculations on stars actually measured by the SDSS with the SDSS 2.5-m tel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
613
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 566 publications
(631 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
17
613
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no clear evidence for color variations as a function of rotational phase, although we note that the data are noisy. We converted these to -=  V R 0.41 0.04 and -=  R I 0.24 0.09 using the translations from Jordi et al (2006) for ease of comparison with existing data sets. The V − R color is consistent with the colors found for active and inactive JFCs and long-period comets, but bluer than these comets in R − I (Jewitt 2015 and references therein; Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no clear evidence for color variations as a function of rotational phase, although we note that the data are noisy. We converted these to -=  V R 0.41 0.04 and -=  R I 0.24 0.09 using the translations from Jordi et al (2006) for ease of comparison with existing data sets. The V − R color is consistent with the colors found for active and inactive JFCs and long-period comets, but bluer than these comets in R − I (Jewitt 2015 and references therein; Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each combination of S and η, we let diameter, D, and geometric albedo, A p , vary freely. The model takes the V-band absolute magnitude (converted from r′ using the translations from Jordi et al 2006), the phase function, and the IRAC photometry as input parameters. For each best-fit model, we computed color corrections for the broad IRAC bandpasses (Laine 2015) and re-executed the fitting procedure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infrared sources lined up along the ∼2 pc long, cold filamentary structure. UBVR C I C magnitudes were tarnsformed from the SDSS data, using the equations published by Ivezić et al (2007) (for BVR C I C ) and Jordi et al (2006) (for U). JHKs magnitudes are from the 2MASS All Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri et al 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched for counterparts of our candidate YSOs in the SDSS Data Release 9 (Ahn et al 2012) within 1″ of the SEIP Source List position. We transformed the SDSS magnitudes of the optical counterparts into the Johnson-Cousins UBVR C I C system, using the equations given in Ivezić et al (2007; for BVR C I C ) and Jordi et al (2006; for U). We found optical counterparts for 149 of the 155 Class II Spitzer sources, and for 8 of the 26 flat spectral energy distribution (SED) sources (see Section 4.1).…”
Section: Supplementary Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting spectra have S/N of 5.2 Å −1 and 6.6 Å −1 , respectively, and mean I-band magnitudes of 23.1 and 23.8, respectively. The i band from our photometry is transformed into the I band following the relation of Jordi et al (2006) and assuming a median r − i color of 0.55 based on the CMD shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Metallicity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%