2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69221-6_115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Analysis on Quality Waqf Reporting Practices of Waqf Institutions in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, this study intends to investigate factors affecting good reporting practices by waqf institutions in Malaysia. This study is the extension of several previous studies by Kamaruddin et al (2018), Hanefah et al (2020), Hanefah et al (2021), Kamaruddin and Hanefah (2021) and Kamaruddin et al (2021) on waqf reporting practices in waqf institutions in Malaysia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, this study intends to investigate factors affecting good reporting practices by waqf institutions in Malaysia. This study is the extension of several previous studies by Kamaruddin et al (2018), Hanefah et al (2020), Hanefah et al (2021), Kamaruddin and Hanefah (2021) and Kamaruddin et al (2021) on waqf reporting practices in waqf institutions in Malaysia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Lastly, a study on waqf quality reporting practices by Hanefah et al (2021) in waqf institutions in Malaysia discovered that the current waqf quality reporting practices are at a moderate level. By observing five quality factors including relevance, understandability, faithful representation, timeliness and comparability, the result shows that the comparability factor has the lowest score.…”
Section: Current Waqf Reporting Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations