2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical analysis of walkability using data from the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the sum score was rescaled such that the neighbourhood walkability index ranged between 0 and 100, with higher scores representing higher neighbourhood walkability levels [ 22 ]. No weights were applied to the components of the neighbourhood walkability index, since an equally weighted index seems to perform well in a Dutch context [ 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the sum score was rescaled such that the neighbourhood walkability index ranged between 0 and 100, with higher scores representing higher neighbourhood walkability levels [ 22 ]. No weights were applied to the components of the neighbourhood walkability index, since an equally weighted index seems to perform well in a Dutch context [ 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach provides detailed data on microscale environmental factors that seemingly increase walking and physical activity behaviours [5] . Audit tools are popular in community planning practice, since they examine easily modifiable factors of the built environment and they do not require to transform macro-level walkability features such as neighbourhood layout or land-use and population spatial patterns [ 9 , 10 , 13 ]. Examples of more analytical reviews regarding micro-level walkability audits can be found in the work of Brownson et al.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Although there is a significant policy interest for healthier, more sustainable, inclusive, and resilient transportation systems [6] , [7] , [8] , there is a significant data scarcity in comparable and street-level walkability indicators [9] . The lack of relevant indicators across Europe and places with heterogeneous characteristics constitutes an important barrier in the generalizability of walkability research findings [ 9 , 10 ]. On this basis and to our knowledge for the first time, our dataset enables micro-level walkability assessments and comparisons among a diverse group of European central urban areas and cities.…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies are generally conducted at nationwide [33] or citywide [7,8] scales. The major shortcoming of this type of large-scale approach is the difficulty of capturing sense-perception effects.…”
Section: Objective Measurements Of Walkable Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%