Tobacco: The Growing Epidemic 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0769-9_299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical analysis of the output effects of cigarette taxes in South Africa and the regional impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, a study on Scotland by McNicoll and Boyle (1992) assumed the elimination of domestic tobacco consumption expenditures and the redistribution of the amount to other sectors, according to average expenditure patterns. Similarly, van der Merwe (1998a, 1998b), Buck et al (1995) and Irvine and Sims (1997) assumed full elimination, a 40 per cent decline and a 20 per cent decline in domestic tobacco consumption, respectively. All studies projected net economic gains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, a study on Scotland by McNicoll and Boyle (1992) assumed the elimination of domestic tobacco consumption expenditures and the redistribution of the amount to other sectors, according to average expenditure patterns. Similarly, van der Merwe (1998a, 1998b), Buck et al (1995) and Irvine and Sims (1997) assumed full elimination, a 40 per cent decline and a 20 per cent decline in domestic tobacco consumption, respectively. All studies projected net economic gains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All studies projected net economic gains. However, a study on Zimbabwe by van der Merwe (1998c) reported net losses under the scenario of elimination of domestic consumption expenditures and all tobacco production in 1980, and redistribution according to ‘average’ input-output patterns, with all production shifted to alternatives in agriculture. In terms of the assumptions regarding the redistribution of the marginal increase in smokers’ income, other scenarios are also suggested in the literature, e.g., increase of expenditure on recreational goods and services rather than on essential items (Buck et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are concerns that recent gains in tobacco control in South Africa may be reduced or even counteracted due to the illicit trade of cigarettes from neighbouring countries. 9 News reports describing cigarette ‘runners’ crossing the Zimbabwe border—the sixth largest tobacco exporter globally 10 —suggest that they carry an average of ZAR 12 900 (∼US$1300) worth of illicitly traded cigarettes per run. 11–13 These reports have been utilised by the South African tobacco industry to argue against further increases in excise taxes, 14 using advertising campaigns against the purchase of illicit cigarettes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%