2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00004-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Trade Openness on Economic Growth: An Evidence for South East European Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of FMOLS and DOLS show that a 1% increase in LLFP decreases LGDPPC by 1.69% and 1.49% in Southern Asia. Results indicate that LLFP has a negative and significant impact on LGDPPC according to FMOLS and an insignificant impact according to DOLS, which is supported by [39,65]. When the ratio of labor force participation exceeds labor demand, it causes disequilibrium in the labor market.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of FMOLS and DOLS show that a 1% increase in LLFP decreases LGDPPC by 1.69% and 1.49% in Southern Asia. Results indicate that LLFP has a negative and significant impact on LGDPPC according to FMOLS and an insignificant impact according to DOLS, which is supported by [39,65]. When the ratio of labor force participation exceeds labor demand, it causes disequilibrium in the labor market.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Kong et al [38] revealed that trade openness has a positive relationship with, and significantly improves the quality of, economic growth in china. In Southeast Europe, Fetahi [39] showed the impact of trade openness and economic growth. The results indicated a positive influence of FDI on economic growth as well as trade openness and GDP by using pooled ordinary least square (POLS) regression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarises the findings of the study. The overall study results show that physical capital is largely positive and significantly associated with economic growth (Dollar 1992;Fischer 1992;Knight, Loayza, and Villanueva 1993;Hamilton and Monteagudo 1998;Barro 1999Barro , 2003Bleaney, Gemmell, and Kneller 2001;Anaman 2004;Acikgoz and Mert 2014;Bayraktar 2006;Prochniak 2011;Checherita-Westphal and Rother 2012;Anyanwu 2014;Fetahi-Vehapi, Sadiku, and Petkovski 2015). In some cases, the results also show that in developing countries investment can be negatively and significantly associated with growth (Most and Vann de Berg 1996;Chang and Mendy 2012).…”
Section: Determinants Of Economic Growth In South-eastern and Centralmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The four empirical studies that are examined include: Botric and Slijepcevic (2008), De Grauwe and Schnabl (2008), Prochniak (2011) and Fetahi-Vehapi, Sadiku, and Petkovski (2015). Botric and Slijepcevic (2008) investigated the association between banking sector efficiency and economic growth in six South-Eastern European countries, namely: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Macedonia and Romania during the period 1995-2005.…”
Section: Determinants Of Economic Growth In South-eastern and Centralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first direction, authors have enriched the endogenous growth model by introducing in addition to the basic model variables other variables related to health conditions, institutions and free trade policy ( (Berthé lemy et al, 1997), (Abdouni & Hanchane, 2008), (Mansouri, 2009) and (Bouoiyour et al, 2009)). On the second research direction, some authors have used more sophisticated econometric methods because studies that rely on cross section data has been criticized (GMM panel data, Bayesian approach ...) ( (Fall & Thiaw, 2012), (Leon-Gonzalez & Vinayagathasan, 2015), (Fetahi-Vehapi et al, 2015) and (Mbulawa, 2015)). The authors of the third research direction have introduced the role of quality education in explaining growth ( (Hanushek & Kimko, 2000), (Barro & Lee, 2001), (Altinok & Murseli, 2007), (Hanushek & Woessmann, 2012), (Altinok et al, 2014)).…”
Section: Review Of the Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%